IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2016i2p444-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Correlation Between The Intellectual Capital Disclosure Level And The Stakeholder Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Popa Dorina Nicoleta

    (Department of Finance-Accounting, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Romania,)

  • Belenesi Marioara

    (Department of Finance-Accounting, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Romania,)

  • Rus Luminita

    (Department of Finance-Accounting, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Romania,)

Abstract

The objective of the research is to identify the link between the stakeholder structure and the level of disclosure of intellectual capital on a sample of 38 Romanian entities listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange, from fields with a strong emphasis on knowledge. The assessment of the degree of disclosure of intellectual capital was conducted using the content analysis of annual reports of entities investigated in 2010-2013 by leveraging the intellectual capital information according to a list of 72 items taken as a standard. The next step in research is to analyze the structure of stakeholders and their grouping into 4 categories: major shareholders the state and government institutions, foreign investors, institutional investors and the investors as natural persons. The question around which the entire research described in this paper oscillates around is whether the stakeholder structure of an entity influences the level of disclosure on intellectual capital. From this general idea we built 4 research hypotheses in order to identify correlations between the average degree of intellectual capital disclosure and various categories of shareholders. The research has led us to conclude that the disclosure of intellectual capital is influenced by the stakeholder structure. For example, the entities whose owner is the State and government institutions disclose more intellectual capital, while those whose ownership is foreign disclose less. This result is contrary to our expectations, but understandable due to the young capital market in Romania, whose limits are inherent (even regarding the profile of the investors). The entities whose owner is the State and government institutions are generally in the pharmaceutical field, are large entities with an age of more than half a century. The entities whose securities are held mostly by domestic institutional investors or individual investors do not either disclose information on intellectual capital more than the average of the sample. Due to the analytical approach of the connection between the level of capital intellectual disclosure and the stakeholder structure (correlations tested on categories of shareholders), the study receives a novelty character among indigenous studies in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Popa Dorina Nicoleta & Belenesi Marioara & Rus Luminita, 2016. "The Correlation Between The Intellectual Capital Disclosure Level And The Stakeholder Structure," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 444-453, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:444-453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2016/n2/043.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intellectual capital disclosure; content analysis; stakeholder structure; knowledge based economy; Romanian listed entities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:444-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.