IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2013i2p451-462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Comparative Risk And Performance Analysis Of Hungarian And Romanian Exchange Indices

Author

Listed:
  • Tarnaczi Tibor

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Applied Economics and Rural Development, Debrecen, Hungary, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Applied Economics and Rural Development, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Kulcsar Edina

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Oradea, Romania, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Applied Economics and Rural Development, Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Nowadays, the most dominant characteristics of the financial environment are instability, variability, riskiness and uncertainty. It is difficult to find a field where the decision making process is risk-free. This statement is especially true in case of financial investments according to which risk taking is rewarded. But it is also true that the financial market participants cannot be completely avoided risks, but there are many options for managing and minimizing them. One of the most well-known theories of financial instruments' risk minimization is the modern portfolio theory, which is the collection of tools and techniques by which a risk-averse investor may construct an optimal portfolio. In portfolio theory it is also known the possibility of risky assets diversification to obtain the optimal return/risk ratio. Consequently, this paper aims to examine the efficient portfolio alternatives by determination of performance ratios based on CAPM model and modern portfolio theory, such as Sharpe ratio, Jensenâ€(tm)s alpha and Treynor ratio and risk measuring methods, such as Value at Risk, or Expected Shortfall. In present research we concentrate to a comparative analysis of portfolios consist in main stock indices shares of two neighboring countries from Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary and Romania. The analysis was performed on the Romanian BET and Hungarian BUX stock market indices using the six-month daily closing prices. Data of the analysis were downloaded from the official websites of Romanian and Hungarian stock exchanges. The statistical analysis was made in R statistical system. Using such tools to uncover information and ask better questions will support the investors to make better and better investment decisions. The results of present research show a greater performance level for Romanian portfolio, but also a higher level of risk, with lower volatility toward market changes and major specific risk. For the Hungarian portfolio, the performance is more temperate, the level of risk is also smaller and the volatility to market factors is more relevant, so the specific risk is moderate in this case.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarnaczi Tibor & Kulcsar Edina, 2013. "The Comparative Risk And Performance Analysis Of Hungarian And Romanian Exchange Indices," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 451-462, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:451-462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2013/n2/043.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    diversification; portfolio theory; risk; efficient portfolio; return; performance analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G19 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:451-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.