IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbmp/y2020iq1-q2-20b12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wirtschaftspolitische Empfehlungen in der EU und deren Umsetzungsbilanz in Österreich

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Auböck

    (Austrian Federal Chancellery)

  • Doris Prammer

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

Abstract

Die Grundzüge der Wirtschaftspolitik der Europäischen Union sind seit dem Jahr 1993 ein konstanter Parameter zur Koordinierung der Wirtschafts- und Haushaltspolitik der EU-Mitgliedstaaten. Aus ihnen werden wirtschaftspolitische Prioritäten für die einzelnen Mitgliedstaaten abgeleitet und in Form länderspezifischer Empfehlungen an jedes EU-Mitglied gerichtet. An Österreich werden vor allem Empfehlungen zur Senkung der Steuerlast auf Arbeit, zur Sicherstellung der langfristigen Tragfähigkeit des Pensionssystems, zur Verbesserung des Bildungssystems und der Anreizsysteme am Arbeitsmarkt sowie zur Erhöhung des Wettbewerbs (z. B. im Dienstleistungsbereich) gerichtet. Da die Umsetzung der länderspezifischen Empfehlungen durch die EU-Mitgliedstaaten rechtlich nicht bindend ist, erfolgt deren Umsetzung oftmals nur in geringem Maße. Seit Beginn des Europäischen Semesters 2011 wurden in Österreich nur 5 % (EU 9 %) der Empfehlungen vollständig umgesetzt, während bei 9 % noch keine Umsetzungsfortschritte gemacht wurden (EU: 5 %). Generell hoch ist die Umsetzung im Finanzsektor, wo der Marktdruck stark auf das politische Handeln Einfluss nimmt. Ähnliches gilt auch bei hohen Leistungsbilanz- und Budgetdefiziten, wo der resultierende Druck am Finanzmarkt ein Treiber für Reformen ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Auböck & Doris Prammer, 2020. "Wirtschaftspolitische Empfehlungen in der EU und deren Umsetzungsbilanz in Österreich," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q1-Q2/20, pages 195-209.
    • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbmp:y:2020:i:q1-q2/20:b:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:4b33febb-f2fa-4d9d-993c-3abf935d25e2/15_MOP_Q1_2_20_Wirtschaftspolitische-Empfehlungen.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Servaas Deroose & Dermot Hodson & Joost Kuhlmann, 2008. "The Broad Economic Policy Guidelines: Before and After the Re-launch of the Lisbon Strategy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46, pages 827-848, September.
    2. Servaas Deroose & Dermot Hodson & Joost Kuhlmann, 2008. "The Broad Economic Policy Guidelines: Before and After the Re‐launch of the Lisbon Strategy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 827-848, September.
    3. Konstantinos Efstathiou & Guntram B. Wolff, 2018. "Is the European Semester effective and useful?," Policy Contributions 26281, Bruegel.
    4. Konstantinos Efstathiou & Guntram B. Wolff, 2019. "What drives national implementation of EU policy recommendations?," Working Papers 30346, Bruegel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. European Fiscal Board (EFB), 2019. "Assessment of EU fiscal rules with a focus on the six and two-pack legislation," Reports 2019, European Fiscal Board.
    2. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2013. "Political legitimacy in a non-optimal currency area," MPIfG Discussion Paper 13/15, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Gräbner-Radkowitsch, Claudius & Hager, Theresa, 2021. "(Mis)measuring competitiveness: the quantification of a malleable concept in the European Semester," ZOE Discussion Papers 8, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    4. Adina Akbik & Marta Migliorati, 2023. "Between Ideology and Nationality: Drivers of Legislative Oversight in the European Parliament's Economic Dialogues," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1026-1046, July.
    5. Arne Heise, 2014. "Zwangsjacke Euro. Die Fehlkonstruktion des Europäischen Economic Governance-Systems," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 40(1), pages 17-31.
    6. Sara Casagrande & Bruno Dallago, 2022. "Socio-Economic and Political Challenges of EU Member Countries: Grasping the Policy Direction of the European Semester," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 64(3), pages 487-519, September.
    7. Mario Alloza & Javier Andrés & Pablo Burriel & Iván Kataryniuk & Javier J. Pérez & Juan Luis Vega, 2021. "La reforma del marco de gobernanza de la política fiscal de la Unión Europea en un nuevo entorno macroeconómico," Occasional Papers 2121, Banco de España.
    8. Bernhard Zeilinger, 2021. "Die Wirkmächtigkeit des Europäischen Semesters und ihre Auswirkung auf die Interessensvertretung durch Arbeitnehmer:innenverbände," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 231, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    9. Marjoleine Hennis, 2022. "Par le Haut Ou Par les Pays‐Bas? French and Dutch Approaches to European Social Policy Coordination Compared," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 136-151, January.
    10. Bańkowski, Krzysztof & Bouabdallah, Othman & Domingues Semeano, João & Dorrucci, Ettore & Freier, Maximilian & Jacquinot, Pascal & Modery, Wolfgang & Rodríguez-Vives, Marta & Valenta, Vilém & Zorell, , 2022. "The economic impact of Next Generation EU: a euro area perspective," Occasional Paper Series 291, European Central Bank.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6dicic97b487dbkfcnlm8fi6tk is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Jean-Charles Bricongne & Nuria Mata Garcia & Alessandro Turrini, 2019. "Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure, economic reforms and policy progress in the European Union," Sciences Po publications 87, Sciences Po.
    13. Lucas Guttenberg & Johannes Hemker & Sander Tordoir, 2021. "Alles wird anders — Wie die Pandemie die EU-Finanzarchitektur verändert," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(2), pages 90-94, February.
    14. Aliénor Cameron & Grégory Claeys & Catarina Midões & Simone Tagliapietra, 2020. "How good is the European Commission’s Just Transition Fund proposal?," Policy Contributions 34981, Bruegel.
    15. Camilla Mariotto, 2022. "The Implementation of Economic Rules: From the Stability and Growth Pact to the European Semester," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 40-57, January.
    16. David Bokhorst, 2022. "The Influence of the European Semester: Case Study Analysis and Lessons for its Post‐Pandemic Transformation," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 101-117, January.
    17. Annette Bongardt & Francisco Torres, 2022. "The European Green Deal: More than an Exit Strategy to the Pandemic Crisis, a Building Block of a Sustainable European Economic Model," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 170-185, January.
    18. Mario Alloza & Javier Andrés & Pablo Burriel & Iván Kataryniuk & Javier J. Pérez & Juan Luis Vega, 2021. "The reform of the european Union’s fiscal governance Framework in a new Macroeconomic environment," Occasional Papers 2121, Banco de España.
    19. Dermot Hodson, 2016. "Eurozone Governance: From the Greek Drama of 2015 to the Five Presidents’ Report," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54, pages 150-166, September.
    20. Philippe Pochet, 2022. "From one crisis to another: changes in the governance of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 119-133, February.
    21. Mark Dawson & Adina Maricut‐Akbik, 2023. "Accountability in the EU's para‐regulatory state: The case of the Economic and Monetary Union," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 142-157, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Europäische Union; Wirtschaftspolitische Koordinierung; länderspezifische Empfehlungen; Strukturpolitik;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbmp:y:2020:i:q1-q2/20:b:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rita Glaser-Schwarz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.