Liberalism vs. etatism: permanenta şi inevitabila dezbatere
In this paper we try to elucidate the proper manner to evaluate economic theories and systems within the present financial crisis context. The main lines of argumentation are as follows: appeals to facts cannot settle the liberalism/etatism debate; the deadlock has an important methodological/epistemological substratum, thus the debate is truly „fundamental”; the only way out is genuine theoretical debate.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): (2010)
Issue (Month): 02 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://oeconomica.org.ro/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oen:econom:y:2010:i:02:id:238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Octavian Jora)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.