IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Measurement error in estimating inflation expectations from survey data: An evaluation by Monte Carlo simulations

Listed author(s):
  • Akira Terai


Registered author(s):

    This paper discusses the measurement error of conversion methods used to convert survey data to a quantitative index, especially the Carlson and Parkin (1975) method. When we want to summarise economic conditions using a numerical value, we often have to depend on survey data and convert them to a quantitative index. However, because survey research restricts responses into specific classifications and respondent’s response density may not be uniform, survey data surely include a specific error. In addition, because the distribution assumed in the Carlson–Parkin method may not fit the respondent’s distribution, this may also produce measurement error. This paper computes the measurement error of the Carlson and Parkin method in order to clarify its properties by Monte Carlo simulation. First, this paper finds that the "balance approach" contains significant error. Second, the error is large when true inflation expectations are large. Third, the error can be decreased by increasing the number of respondents. Fourth, changes in the response classification do not bring about dramatic changes compared with an increase in the number of respondents.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by OECD Publishing, Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys in its journal OECD Journal: Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis.

    Volume (Year): 2009 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 133-156

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:oec:stdkab:5ks9v45bggd5
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stdkab:5ks9v45bggd5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.