IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ods/journl/v2y2013i4p235-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of the Financial Performance: Evidence from UK and Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Narzia Florin

    (American International University, Bangladesh)

Abstract

This research paper empirically examines the performance indicators of banking activities in Bangladesh and United Kingdom through highlighting their profitability & productivity. Financial performance evaluation is very interesting topic for business due to acute competition in the market. Organisations are now more concerned with their overall performance than ever before as they can evaluate their performance by comparing with competitor’s one. Normally, the organization’s value creation change due to technology, competition, change of taste and behaviour of customers. There is no single method or strategy to evaluate the financial performance of banks. Generally it is associated with liquidity and operational effect linked to the profitability of banks. Capital ratios, in their turn, help to see whether the banks have the capacity to cover their liabilities or not.

Suggested Citation

  • Narzia Florin, 2013. "A Comparative Analysis of the Financial Performance: Evidence from UK and Bangladesh," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 2(4), pages 235-243.
  • Handle: RePEc:ods:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:235-243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jami.org.ua/abstracts2-4.htm
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:ods:journl:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:186-196 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. G.V. Satya Sekhar, 2016. "Ten Myths of Performance Evaluation of Mutual Funds: a Snapshot View," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 5(1), pages 59-65, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ods:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:235-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anatoliy G. Goncharuk). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dmonaua.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.