IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntu/ntugeo/vol13-iss2-103-111.html

The Asian Tigers’ Degree Of Participation In The New Silk Roads Initiated By China

Author

Listed:
  • IULIA MONICA OEHLER-ŞINCAI

    (Department of International Economic Analysis Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy Calea 13 Septembrie No.13, Bucharest, ROMANIA)

Abstract

The primary objective of this paper is to synthesize the positions of nine key actors relevant to the world economy, specifically the Asian Tigers, regarding China and its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The literature review and official positions underscore that the first four Asian Tigers, Hong Kong-China, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan, together with five countries considered the Asian Tigers of the second generation, namely Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam, have different positions and interests in relation to China alongside the New Silk Roads. They also offer various levels of attractiveness for China from the perspective of cooperation opportunities in the framework of the BRI. Hong Kong, as a Special Administrative Region of China, is described in the literature as a “key driver and value creator in advancing the BRI”. In its turn, Singapore, a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), has emerged as one of China’s most consistent and reliable partners. The engagement of the other five ASEAN members with China is unevenly distributed. Striking the right balance between benefits and costs is a key objective of these countries. At the same time, they have as priorities both the alliance with the United States and economic ties with China. Among the nine Asian Tigers, Taiwan is the only one that does not participate in China's BRI. It aims to counter China’s influence in the region and reduce its economic dependency on China. It has launched various policies, including the New Southbound Policy, to develop strong relationships with both China’s partners, but especially with critics of China, such as the Philippines and India. As regards South Korea, in the literature are revealed “repeated setbacks in the BRI cooperation between South Korea and China”, as well as South Korea’s inclination towards “avoiding as much as possible too much involvement”.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulia Monica Oehler-Şincai, 2025. "The Asian Tigers’ Degree Of Participation In The New Silk Roads Initiated By China," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 13(2), pages 103-111, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol13-iss2-103-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.globeco.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_13_no_2/geo_2025_vol13_no2_art_011.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol13-iss2-103-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefan Ciucu The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Stefan Ciucu to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuntro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.