IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v45y1992i4p389-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of Taxpayer Preference for Aggressive Tax Advice

Author

Listed:
  • Hite, Peggy A.
  • McGill, Gary A.

Abstract

Experimentally examines taxpayer preference for aggressive advice using a national sample of U.S. taxpayers. Investigates whether taxpayers agreed with preparers' advice in ambiguous situations that varied by type of preparer recommendation, probability of audit, and whether or not there would be a severe penalty. Concludes that on average, taxpayers do not have a preference for aggressive tax advice.

Suggested Citation

  • Hite, Peggy A. & McGill, Gary A., 1992. "An Examination of Taxpayer Preference for Aggressive Tax Advice," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 45(4), pages 389-403, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:45:y:1992:i:4:p:389-403
    DOI: 10.1086/NTJ41788980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788980
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788980
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/NTJ41788980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evers, Andrea & Matthaei, Eva Kristina, 2021. "Steuerplanung unter Unsicherheit: Eine Befragungsstudie zum Brexit," Discussion Papers 2021/10, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    2. Tan, Lin Mei, 1999. "Taxpayers' preference for type of advice from tax practitioner: A preliminary examination," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 431-447, August.
    3. Demirbag, Mehmet & Frecknall-Hughes, Jane & Glaister, Keith W. & Tatoglu, Ekrem, 2013. "Ethics and taxation: A cross-national comparison of UK and Turkish firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 100-111.
    4. Anna P. Kireyenko, 2015. "Methods of investigating taxation in today’s foreign literature," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 1(2-3), pages 209-228.
    5. Schmidt, Dennis R., 2001. "The prospects of taxpayer agreement with aggressive tax advice," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 157-172, April.
    6. Murphy, Kristina, 2004. "Aggressive tax planning: Differentiating those playing the game from those who don't," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 307-329, June.
    7. Fateme Kaghazloo & Ana Clara Borrego, 2022. "Designing a Model of the Factors Affecting Tax professionals' Tax noncompliant behaviour using The ISM Approach," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1099-1120, December.
    8. Frecknall-Hughes, Jane & Gangl, Katharina & Hofmann, Eva & Hartl, Barbara & Kirchler, Erich, 2023. "The influence of tax authorities on the employment of tax practitioners: Empirical evidence from a survey and interview study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Rex Marshall & Malcolm Smith & Robert Armstrong, 2010. "Ethical issues facing tax professionals," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 197-220, September.
    10. Kirchler, Erich & Niemirowski, Apolonia & Wearing, Alexander, 2006. "Shared subjective views, intent to cooperate and tax compliance: Similarities between Australian taxpayers and tax officers," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 502-517, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:45:y:1992:i:4:p:389-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.