IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlsmr/111.00000076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradoxical Tensions Across Multiple Levels and Top Management Team Cross-Level Bridging in Coopetition: A Conceptual Model

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Bengtsson
  • Tatbeeq Raza-Ullah

Abstract

In contrast to the conventional strategic management research, which emphasizes either cooperation or competition as a beneficial strategy, emerging literature on coopetition has advanced our understanding of how pursuing both cooperation and competition can yield greater benefits. However, the literature offers limited insights into the multi-level dynamics of coopetition and the role of top management teams (TMT) in navigating paradoxical tensions that cascade across levels — tensions that, if not tackled well, can overturn the benefits associated with coopetition. Drawing on the paradox literature, this paper develops a conceptual model to illustrate how the coopetition paradox unfolds across different levels, activating performing, organizing, and belonging tensions, that, in turn, shape the interplay between cooperation and competition at the inter-firm level. A key contribution of this paper is its focus on the central role of TMTs in managing multiple tensions across levels, particularly through the synchronous orchestration of internal processes at the firm level while constantly navigating coopetitive interactions at the inter-firm level.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Bengtsson & Tatbeeq Raza-Ullah, 2025. "Paradoxical Tensions Across Multiple Levels and Top Management Team Cross-Level Bridging in Coopetition: A Conceptual Model," Strategic Management Review, now publishers, vol. 6(1-2), pages 107-133, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlsmr:111.00000076
    DOI: 10.1561/111.00000076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/111.00000076
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/111.00000076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlsmr:111.00000076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.