IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlsbe/102.00000062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Misinformation and its Implications for Green Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Chan, Nathan W.

Abstract

This paper develops and analyzes a model of misinformation in markets for so-called "green" products, and more generally, impure public goods. Unlike previous studies of green goods, I account for strategic interactions between consumers and consider equilibrium outcomes under misinformation. A major finding is that misinformation can help or harm environmental quality and welfare, and the direction of these changes depends critically upon whether "green" or "brown" consumers are more likely to be misinformed. These results are particularly germane to markets where nascent methods for analyzing environmental impacts, like lifecycle assessments (LCA) and carbon footprinting, are applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan, Nathan W., 2015. "Misinformation and its Implications for Green Markets," Strategic Behavior and the Environment, now publishers, vol. 5(3-4), pages 301-316, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlsbe:102.00000062
    DOI: 10.1561/102.00000062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/102.00000062
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/102.00000062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montoya-Villalobos, Maria J., 2023. "Green consumption: The role of confidence and pessimism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Nathan W. Chan, 2019. "Funding Global Environmental Public Goods Through Multilateral Financial Mechanisms," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(2), pages 515-531, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information; Green markets; Public goods; Greenwashing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlsbe:102.00000062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.