IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlpip/113.00000121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Executive Agency Ideology Using Large Language Models

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas G. Napolio

Abstract

I scale executive agencies along a liberal–conservative dimension using ChatGPT, a large language model, to produce both static measures of executive agency ideology and dynamic measures spanning 1949–2020, almost five decades more coverage than existing dynamic measures. My measure correlates strongly with existing measures although does not perfectly replicate them, indicating the measure is not simply regurgitating existing ones. In addition, the new measure predicts congressional delegation to agencies from 1949 to 2018 consistent with the “ally principle” that political actors delegate to agents closest to them in ideological space. The approach adopted here has an advantage over existing ones because my approach produces measures that are cheaper (~$50) and faster (~4 hours of computing time) to produce, that go back four decades earlier than existing measures, and that can easily be scaled up to include more agencies or time periods without much added cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas G. Napolio, 2025. "Measuring Executive Agency Ideology Using Large Language Models," Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 6(2), pages 161-180, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000121
    DOI: 10.1561/113.00000121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/113.00000121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.