IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlpip/113.00000046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

At Your Own Risk: A Model of Delegation with Ambiguous Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Jieun Kim

Abstract

Contrary to the lessons of principal-agent models, Chinese leaders have often provided local officials with ambiguous policy guidelines that do not clarify the boundaries of discretion. While ambiguity can offer local officials flexibility in policy implementation, it can also instill fear of punishment among possible transgressors and encourage preemptive self-censoring. Incorporating both perspectives, I develop a formal model that analyzes a situation in which ambiguity allows flexibility for certain types of local officials while intimidating others. I argue that central leaders use ambiguity as a screening tool to encourage only “competent†local officials — those who have policy expertise for producing good outcomes — to choose a gray-area policy at their own risk, while deterring “incompetent†officials from doing so. I illustrate the model with the case of state-owned enterprise restructuring in China. The argument is broadly applicable to interactions between all upperand lower-level actors in the bureaucratic hierarchy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jieun Kim, 2022. "At Your Own Risk: A Model of Delegation with Ambiguous Guidelines," Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 2(4), pages 483-508, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000046
    DOI: 10.1561/113.00000046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000046
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/113.00000046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.