IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnllfa/108.00000035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Transfers and Insider Trading in Stock Substitutes: Evidence from Economically Linked Firms in the Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Jengfang
  • Liao, Woody M.
  • Wu, Guan-Syun
  • Yang, Yanjie

Abstract

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 prohibits insiders from using privileged information to trade the stocks of their own firms. However, insiders could still exploit confidential inside information by trading the stocks of their firm’s supply chain partners. This form of insider trading is referred to as trading in stock substitutes in the supply chain. Using a sample of merger and acquisition (M&A) deals, we test hypotheses about insider trading in stock substitutes by interlocked insiders who are simultaneously affiliated with the merging firms (acquirer or target firms) and their supply chain partner firms (supplier or customer firms). We find that these interlocked insiders trade the stocks of merging firms’ supply chain partner firms using the private information before M&A announcements. Specifically, our results show that interlocked insiders’ net purchases of these supply chain partners’ shares are positively associated with these partner firms’ 5-day abnormal returns around M&A announcements. Furthermore, in our subgroup analysis, we find that insider trading in stock substitutes is more evident in the merging firms’ suppliers than in their customers. Finally, as expected, we find that insider trading in stock substitutes is more prevalent in the presence of lower litigation risk and greater information asymmetry of the partner firms. Our findings provide the first empirical evidence of insider trading in stock substitutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Jengfang & Liao, Woody M. & Wu, Guan-Syun & Yang, Yanjie, 2019. "Information Transfers and Insider Trading in Stock Substitutes: Evidence from Economically Linked Firms in the Supply Chain," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 4(1), pages 103–135-1, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnllfa:108.00000035
    DOI: 10.1561/108.00000035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/108.00000035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/108.00000035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnllfa:108.00000035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.