IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jlqjps/100.00022178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Formal Theory of Public Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Diermeier
  • Michael Schnabel

Abstract

We propose a mathematical theory of public opinion based on Zaller (1992). We show how our theory can provide a rigorous account for various empirical implications identified by Zaller (1992). We then show that it can also account for empirical regularities on information and response volatility identified by Alvarez and Brehm (2002), media influence and polarization (Zaller, 1992), as well as media slant, priming, framing, and agenda setting. We then derive the "miracle of aggregation" argument due to Page and Shapiro (1992) and apply it to the study of polarization, media influence, and opinion change (Stimson, 2015 [2004]). Our theory provides a general framework for studying public opinion in a rigorous fashion.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Diermeier & Michael Schnabel, 2025. "A Formal Theory of Public Opinion," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 20(1), pages 101-137, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00022178
    DOI: 10.1561/100.00022178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00022178
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/100.00022178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00022178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.