IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jlqjps/100.00022114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

District Competitiveness Increases Voter Turnout: Evidence from Repeated Redistricting in North Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Ainsworth
  • Emanuel Garcia Munoz
  • Andres Munoz Gomez

Abstract

We study whether competitive legislative districts cause higher voter turnout. To do so, we employ rich data on the 2006 to 2020 elections in North Carolina. We make use of variation in district competitiveness due to repeated bouts of redistricting, a process in which district boundaries are redrawn. Specifically, we compare people who share the same districts in each legislative chamber (U.S. House, NC Senate, NC House) before redistricting but who differ in districts after redistricting. We match these people on demographics, party registration, and pre-redistricting turnout. We then track their turnout behavior in post-redistricting elections. For the U.S. House, switching from an uncompetitive "80–20" district to a competitive "55–45" district increases turnout by a rate of 1 percentage point per election of exposure. For the state chambers, the magnitude is 0.6. Effects are highly persistent and sum across chambers. They appear to be explained in part by a learning channel, where living in a competitive district induces people to believe that races can be competitive.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Ainsworth & Emanuel Garcia Munoz & Andres Munoz Gomez, 2024. "District Competitiveness Increases Voter Turnout: Evidence from Repeated Redistricting in North Carolina," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 19(4), pages 387-432, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00022114
    DOI: 10.1561/100.00022114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00022114
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/100.00022114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00022114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.