IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nov/artigo/v28y2018i2p609-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tradição de debates na Grã-Bretanha e a nova economia política: William Thompson e John Stuart Mill na Sociedade Cooperativa de Londres em 1825 [The debating tradition in Britain and the new political economy: William Thompson and John Stuart Mill at the London Co-operative Society in 1825]

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Leonardo Kulnig Cinelli

    (UNB)

  • Rogério Arthmar

    (UFES)

Abstract

O artigo analisa o debate entre William Thompson e John Stuart Mill ocorrido na Sociedade Cooperativa de Londres em 1825 a respeito das vantagens do cooperativismo face ao sistema competitivo. O contexto geral da controvérsia é apresentado por meio de uma revisão histórica da tradição de debates entre os trabalhadores britânicos. Após, as doutrinas filosóficas de Jeremy Bentham e Robert Owen são delineadas por se tratarem das duas principais forças de mudança social no país nos anos de 1820, as quais viriam a colidir durante o enfretamento na Sociedade Cooperativa. Na sequência, examinam-se as ideias de William Thompson sobre a distribuição de renda e os males morais derivados da concorrência. Finalmente, revisa-se a abordagem de John Stuart Mill para tais temas, mostrando-se que a sua concepção básica da liberdade individual não se modificou ao longo de sua vida, a despeito de sua posterior concordância acerca dos benefícios do cooperativismo. As conclusões realçam a originalidade dos elementos teóricos utilizados no debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Leonardo Kulnig Cinelli & Rogério Arthmar, 2018. "A tradição de debates na Grã-Bretanha e a nova economia política: William Thompson e John Stuart Mill na Sociedade Cooperativa de Londres em 1825 [The debating tradition in Britain and the new politic," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 28(2), pages 609-636, May-Augus.
  • Handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:28:y:2018:i:2:p:609-636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/neco/v28n2/1980-5381-neco-28-02-609.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-63512018000200609&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2002. "About the Authors," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 18(2-3), pages 286-289, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob Jensen & Ethan Kaplan & Suresh Naidu & Laurence Wilse-Samson, 2012. "Political Polarization and the Dynamics of Political Language: Evidence from 130 Years of Partisan Speech," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 45(2 (Fall)), pages 1-81.
    2. D. V. Shcherbakova & A. A. Medved, 2019. "Factors of Investment Attractiveness of Russian Regions," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 11.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    free speech; cooperation; competition; social reform; liberty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B14 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Socialist; Marxist
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:28:y:2018:i:2:p:609-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucas Resende de Carvalho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.