IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nov/artigo/v27y2017i1p65-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

As críticas de Amartya Sen à teoria da escolha social de Kenneth Arrow [Amartya Sen’s criticism of Kenneth Arrow’s social choice theory]

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Beltrame

    (PUC-SP)

  • Laura Valladão de Mattos

    (USP)

Abstract

This article attempts to systematize Amartya Sen’s criticism of Arrow’s theoretical structure and to show how, in order to avoid the devastating results of the impossibility theorem, Sen argues for the expansion of the universe of information used as the basis of social choice. Initially, this article gives a brief summary of Arrow’s social choice theory with the purpose of providing a broad context to aid the understanding of the nature of Sen’s criticisms. Next, it presents Sen’s interpretations of the reasons that led to the impossibility result and this author’s criticism of the foundations of Arrow’s theory. Finally, some considerations are presented concerning the nature of Sen’s criticism and its consequences for the views on welfare that he eventually adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Beltrame & Laura Valladão de Mattos, 2017. "As críticas de Amartya Sen à teoria da escolha social de Kenneth Arrow [Amartya Sen’s criticism of Kenneth Arrow’s social choice theory]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 27(1), pages 65-88, January-A.
  • Handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:27:y:2017:i:1:p:65-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/neco/v27n1/1980-5381-neco-27-01-00065.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-63512017000100065&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Amartya Sen; social choice; Kenneth Arrow; impossibility theorem; informational basis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • B29 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:27:y:2017:i:1:p:65-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucas Resende de Carvalho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.