IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Filosofia da ciência como ferramenta microeconômica [Philosophy of science as a microeconomic tool]


  • Fabio Barbieri

    (Universidade P. Mackenzie e Unifecap)


Neoclassical theory assumes perfect knowledge. In turn, Hayekian criticism of this theory affirms that this knowledge is the result of the competitive process, and therefore cannot be considered as a given. The "Hayek Problem" investigates the conditions under which agents knowledge approaches the true fundamentals of an economy. In order to solve this problem, our paper uses ideas taken from the methodology of science known as the "growth of knowledge" theory (Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos and others). These ideas are used to understand how agents knowledge evolves, especially the knowledge of entrepreneurs. These are seen as active formulators of conjectural entrepreneurial theories that are criticized in the competitive process, and not as passive agents that maximize already known functions as in conventional theory. We use philosophy of science not to methodologically analyze microeconomics, but as an analytical tool that is part of economic theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Barbieri, 2006. "Filosofia da ciência como ferramenta microeconômica [Philosophy of science as a microeconomic tool]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 16(3), pages 507-534, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:16:y:2006:i:3:p:507-534

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    microeconomics; entrepreneurship; methodology; Hayek; Popper;

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:16:y:2006:i:3:p:507-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bárbara Freitas Paglioto). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.