IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2021i4p311-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Franois de La Mothe Le Vayer and His De l'instruction de Monsieur le Dauphin: The Concepts of the Golden Mean and Public Good

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksey Lyubzhin

Abstract

Alexey I. Lyubzhin, Doctor of Sciences in Philology, Head of the Department of History, Dmitry Pozharsky University; Research Fellow, Laboratory for Interdisciplinary Analysis of Society, Culture and History (IASCH), National Research University Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. Address: 9 Institutsky Ln, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Moscow Oblast, Russian Federation. E-mail: vultur@mail.ru This article investigates into the structure and content of De l'instruction de Monsieur le Dauphin by Franois de La Mothe Le Vayer. Le Vayer describes the four pillars of the state - religion, justice, finance, and military power - speculating on how thoroughly a hereditary prince of France should study liberal and mechanical arts. He does not recommend the majority of subjects for detailed study, making an exception for rhetoric in the first place and adding three more important subjects: geography, ethics, and physics. In fine arts, according to Le Vayer, the king had better be an experienced connoisseur than a creator. He also describes pretty much in detail the physical activities useful for a king in waiting (swimming, dance, and armed martial arts are recommended, while running is not), as well as possible games and ways of entertainment. A large proportion of the treatise is devoted to proving the harmfulness of astrology, chemistry, and magic. The key principles underlying Le Vayer's speculations are the golden mean and the use of general education as a basis, the elements of which he analyzes separately for applicability in the instruction of a hereditary prince.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksey Lyubzhin, 2021. "Franois de La Mothe Le Vayer and His De l'instruction de Monsieur le Dauphin: The Concepts of the Golden Mean and Public Good," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 311-332.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2021:i:4:p:311-332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2021/12/13/1776225288/%D0%9B%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%BD.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2021:i:4:p:311-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.