IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2006i1p232-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External Evaluation and the Evolution of Professional training Programs at Colleges

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandr Chuchalin

Abstract

Professional training programs at colleges are in need of improvement in order to adapt to the ever-changing labor market. The article considers the relevant issues on the example of the Tomsk polytechnic university. Special attention is paid to the most efficient way of increasing the quality of training, namely by instituting continuous external control and evaluation of educational programs by national and international professional communities. The authors analyze the changes in the structure and content of educational programs so that they conform to national and international criteria for social and professional accreditation. The creation and certification of a quality management system at the college that would conform to international standards is also discussed. The authors analyze in detail the Bachelor's degree program in electrical engineering, which is based on the university's best traditions of engineering training.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandr Chuchalin, 2006. "External Evaluation and the Evolution of Professional training Programs at Colleges," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 232-253.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2006:i:1:p:232-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2006:i:1:p:232-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.