IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2014i5p112-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Introduction Of Program Budgeting In Russia: 20 Years Of Experience With Russian Budgetary Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Mstislav Afanasyev
  • Nataliya Shash

Abstract

This paper examines Russias 20 years of experience with budgetary reforms. The authors focus most of their attention on the introduction into Russian budgetary practice of special-program methods, which is a key feature of the ongoing budgetary reform in the country. The main phases of the reform of the budgetary process are analyzed, from the formulation of programs for socio-economic development and the first attempts to apply the tools of program budgeting (the formulation of special federal programs) to the preparation of the federal budget on the basis of government programs and the transition to a program-based budgetary format for constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mstislav Afanasyev & Nataliya Shash, 2014. "The Introduction Of Program Budgeting In Russia: 20 Years Of Experience With Russian Budgetary Reforms," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 5, pages 112-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2014:i:5:p:112-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2015/06/29/1082407521/Afanasiev,%20Shash.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mstislav Afanasyev & Nataliya Shash, 2014. "Russian budgetary reforms: from programs of social and economic development to state programs of the Russian Federation," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 48-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mstislav Afanasyev & Nataliya Shash, 2016. "Moscow Budget and Growth of Public Finances Efficiency," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 72-95.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mstislav Afanasyev & Nataliya Shash, 2016. "Moscow Budget and Growth of Public Finances Efficiency," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 72-95.
    2. Rudnik, B. & Romanova, V., 2017. "The Budgetary Financing of Socio-Cultural Sphere," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 124-142.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2014:i:5:p:112-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.