IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/untern/10.5771-0042-059x-2020-2-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradox of Agility: Reduce Formalization? Introduce Formalization!

Author

Listed:
  • Bachmann, Miriam
  • Kurzmann, Anne
  • Gutierrez, Barbara Castrellon
  • Neyer, Anne-Katrin

Abstract

Agile concepts become increasingly popular, given their ability to adapt to a turbulent environment. Hence, they are implemented in various organizations and industries. In this context, complete flexibility and the abolition of formalization in terms of rules, procedures, and instructions are often seen as the Holy Grail for success. Having said this, the following article identifies a paradoxical aspect of agility: The decrease of formalization of some aspects goes along with an increase of formalization of other aspects. Furthermore, we differentiate between two forms of formalization: a coercive, agility hindering and an enabling, agility supporting formalization. We state that in the case of agile adoption, the reduction of coercive formalization leads to an increase in enabling formalization. Building on insights from four case studies, we derive five propositions regarding formalized aspects in the context of agility. Then, we develop a model that links the type and level of formalization to four different types of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bachmann, Miriam & Kurzmann, Anne & Gutierrez, Barbara Castrellon & Neyer, Anne-Katrin, 2020. "The Paradox of Agility: Reduce Formalization? Introduce Formalization!," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 74(2), pages 122-135.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2020-2-122
    DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2020-2-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0042-059X-2020-2-122
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0042-059X-2020-2-122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2020-2-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.