IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/untern/10.5771-0042-059x-2018-4-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zur Vergütung von Arbeitnehmererfindungen als ökonomisches Allokationsproblem: Ein spieltheoretischer Lösungsansatz

Author

Listed:
  • Follert, Florian

Abstract

According to § 9 ArbnErfG the employer has to pay a fair compensation to the employee when he takes advantages of an invention that is made by the employee. It is questionable how this compensation could be set, because both parties contributes to the invention. When the employee disagrees with the suggestion of the employer, he can call the mediation court at the “Patentamt” or an ordinary court. A referee has to set an arbitration value which can lead to a balance of interests. This paper highlights this allocation problem and discusses different models for the allocation of economic value and the negotiation concerning the invention of an employee.

Suggested Citation

  • Follert, Florian, 2018. "Zur Vergütung von Arbeitnehmererfindungen als ökonomisches Allokationsproblem: Ein spieltheoretischer Lösungsansatz," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 72(4), pages 346-368.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2018-4-346
    DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2018-4-346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0042-059X-2018-4-346
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0042-059X-2018-4-346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Follert Florian & Richau Lukas & Emrich Eike & Pierdzioch Christian, 2020. "Collective Decision-making: FIFA from the Perspective of Public Choice," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2018-4-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.