Author
Listed:
- Vasiliev, M.
(Melentiev Energy Systems Institute SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia)
- Keshikova, N.
(Irkutsk Institute (branch) All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia), Irkutsk, Russia)
Abstract
The paper deals with a concept of dominant position of a supplier and with its implementation in the legal regulation of the Russian wholesale electricity market. The study involves describing the theoretical framework of the concept of dominant position and analyzing the legal rules that set the criteria to recognize market participant as the one having dominant position. These legal rules are evaluated from the viewpoint of the principle of legal certainty. The sanctions imposed against dominating and not dominating market participants are compared. An analysis of how a participant can abuse market dominance while bidding for sale of electricity and electric capacity and how the corresponding legal rules match the Russian electricity market architecture is provided. The authors come to a conclusion that the current criteria for dominant position in wholesale electricity market include not only characteristics of participant's position in the market but also participant's behavior, which comes into conflict with the theory and the rules set by the Federal law "On protection of competition". Posteriori market modelling applied to establish the dominant position of suppliers contradicts the principle of legal certainty. Sanction to the same action - price manipulation - can be stricter against not dominating participants, although it is the dominant position that is an aggravating factor that increases the societal harm of the action. Additionally, the term "abusing market dominance" needs to be clarified.
Suggested Citation
Vasiliev, M. & Keshikova, N., 2024.
"Supplier's dominant position at the Russian wholesale electricity market: Key elements of regulation,"
Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 65(4), pages 55-67.
Handle:
RePEc:nea:journl:y:2024:i:65:p:55-67
DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2024_4_55-67
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
- L49 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Other
- L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2024:i:65:p:55-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.