IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v590y2021i7844d10.1038_s41586-020-03085-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control of osteoblast regeneration by a train of Erk activity waves

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro De Simone

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center)

  • Maya N. Evanitsky

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center)

  • Luke Hayden

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center)

  • Ben D. Cox

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center
    University of California, Davis)

  • Julia Wang

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center)

  • Valerie A. Tornini

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center
    Yale University School of Medicine)

  • Jianhong Ou

    (Duke University)

  • Anna Chao

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center)

  • Kenneth D. Poss

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center
    Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center)

  • Stefano Di Talia

    (Duke University
    Duke University Medical Center
    Duke University Medical Center)

Abstract

Regeneration is a complex chain of events that restores a tissue to its original size and shape. The tissue-wide coordination of cellular dynamics that is needed for proper morphogenesis is challenged by the large dimensions of regenerating body parts. Feedback mechanisms in biochemical pathways can provide effective communication across great distances1–5, but how they might regulate growth during tissue regeneration is unresolved6,7. Here we report that rhythmic travelling waves of Erk activity control the growth of bone in time and space in regenerating zebrafish scales, millimetre-sized discs of protective body armour. We find that waves of Erk activity travel across the osteoblast population as expanding concentric rings that are broadcast from a central source, inducing ring-like patterns of tissue growth. Using a combination of theoretical and experimental analyses, we show that Erk activity propagates as excitable trigger waves that are able to traverse the entire scale in approximately two days and that the frequency of wave generation controls the rate of scale regeneration. Furthermore, the periodic induction of synchronous, tissue-wide activation of Erk in place of travelling waves impairs tissue growth, which indicates that wave-distributed Erk activation is key to regeneration. Our findings reveal trigger waves as a regulatory strategy to coordinate cell behaviour and instruct tissue form during regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro De Simone & Maya N. Evanitsky & Luke Hayden & Ben D. Cox & Julia Wang & Valerie A. Tornini & Jianhong Ou & Anna Chao & Kenneth D. Poss & Stefano Di Talia, 2021. "Control of osteoblast regeneration by a train of Erk activity waves," Nature, Nature, vol. 590(7844), pages 129-133, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:590:y:2021:i:7844:d:10.1038_s41586-020-03085-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-03085-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03085-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-03085-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florian J. Bock & Egor Sedov & Elle Koren & Anna L. Koessinger & Catherine Cloix & Désirée Zerbst & Dimitris Athineos & Jayanthi Anand & Kirsteen J. Campbell & Karen Blyth & Yaron Fuchs & Stephen W. G, 2021. "Apoptotic stress-induced FGF signalling promotes non-cell autonomous resistance to cell death," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:590:y:2021:i:7844:d:10.1038_s41586-020-03085-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.