IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v589y2021i7840d10.1038_s41586-020-2960-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TRF2-independent chromosome end protection during pluripotency

Author

Listed:
  • Phil Ruis

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • David Ly

    (University of Sydney
    The University of Notre Dame Australia)

  • Valerie Borel

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Georgia R. Kafer

    (University of Sydney)

  • Afshan McCarthy

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Steven Howell

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Robert Blassberg

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Ambrosius P. Snijders

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • James Briscoe

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Kathy K. Niakan

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Paulina Marzec

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Anthony J. Cesare

    (University of Sydney)

  • Simon J. Boulton

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

Abstract

Mammalian telomeres protect chromosome ends from aberrant DNA repair1. TRF2, a component of the telomere-specific shelterin protein complex, facilitates end protection through sequestration of the terminal telomere repeat sequence within a lariat T-loop structure2,3. Deleting TRF2 (also known as TERF2) in somatic cells abolishes T-loop formation, which coincides with telomere deprotection, chromosome end-to-end fusions and inviability3–9. Here we establish that, by contrast, TRF2 is largely dispensable for telomere protection in mouse pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) and epiblast stem cells. ES cell telomeres devoid of TRF2 instead activate an attenuated telomeric DNA damage response that lacks accompanying telomere fusions, and propagate for multiple generations. The induction of telomere dysfunction in ES cells, consistent with somatic deletion of Trf2 (also known as Terf2), occurs only following the removal of the entire shelterin complex. Consistent with TRF2 being largely dispensable for telomere protection specifically during early embryonic development, cells exiting pluripotency rapidly switch to TRF2-dependent end protection. In addition, Trf2-null embryos arrest before implantation, with evidence of strong DNA damage response signalling and apoptosis specifically in the non-pluripotent compartment. Finally, we show that ES cells form T-loops independently of TRF2, which reveals why TRF2 is dispensable for end protection during pluripotency. Collectively, these data establish that telomere protection is solved by distinct mechanisms in pluripotent and somatic tissues.

Suggested Citation

  • Phil Ruis & David Ly & Valerie Borel & Georgia R. Kafer & Afshan McCarthy & Steven Howell & Robert Blassberg & Ambrosius P. Snijders & James Briscoe & Kathy K. Niakan & Paulina Marzec & Anthony J. Ces, 2021. "TRF2-independent chromosome end protection during pluripotency," Nature, Nature, vol. 589(7840), pages 103-109, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:589:y:2021:i:7840:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2960-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2960-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2960-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2960-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy K. Turkalo & Antonio Maffia & Johannes J. Schabort & Samuel G. Regalado & Mital Bhakta & Marco Blanchette & Diana C. J. Spierings & Peter M. Lansdorp & Dirk Hockemeyer, 2023. "A non-genetic switch triggers alternative telomere lengthening and cellular immortalization in ATRX deficient cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:589:y:2021:i:7840:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2960-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.