Author
Listed:
- Julia K. Green
(Columbia University)
- Sonia I. Seneviratne
(ETH Zurich)
- Alexis M. Berg
(Princeton University)
- Kirsten L. Findell
(Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory)
- Stefan Hagemann
(Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht)
- David M. Lawrence
(Terrestrial Sciences, National Center for Atmospheric Research)
- Pierre Gentine
(Columbia University
Columbia University)
Abstract
Although the terrestrial biosphere absorbs about 25 per cent of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the rate of land carbon uptake remains highly uncertain, leading to uncertainties in climate projections1,2. Understanding the factors that limit or drive land carbon storage is therefore important for improving climate predictions. One potential limiting factor for land carbon uptake is soil moisture, which can reduce gross primary production through ecosystem water stress3,4, cause vegetation mortality5 and further exacerbate climate extremes due to land–atmosphere feedbacks6. Previous work has explored the impact of soil-moisture availability on past carbon-flux variability3,7,8. However, the influence of soil-moisture variability and trends on the long-term carbon sink and the mechanisms responsible for associated carbon losses remain uncertain. Here we use the data output from four Earth system models9 from a series of experiments to analyse the responses of terrestrial net biome productivity to soil-moisture changes, and find that soil-moisture variability and trends induce large CO2 fluxes (about two to three gigatons of carbon per year; comparable with the land carbon sink itself1) throughout the twenty-first century. Subseasonal and interannual soil-moisture variability generate CO2 as a result of the nonlinear response of photosynthesis and net ecosystem exchange to soil-water availability and of the increased temperature and vapour pressure deficit caused by land–atmosphere interactions. Soil-moisture variability reduces the present land carbon sink, and its increase and drying trends in several regions are expected to reduce it further. Our results emphasize that the capacity of continents to act as a future carbon sink critically depends on the nonlinear response of carbon fluxes to soil moisture and on land–atmosphere interactions. This suggests that the increasing trend in carbon uptake rate may not be sustained past the middle of the century and could result in accelerated atmospheric CO2 growth.
Suggested Citation
Julia K. Green & Sonia I. Seneviratne & Alexis M. Berg & Kirsten L. Findell & Stefan Hagemann & David M. Lawrence & Pierre Gentine, 2019.
"Large influence of soil moisture on long-term terrestrial carbon uptake,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 565(7740), pages 476-479, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:565:y:2019:i:7740:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0848-x
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0848-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Guangcun Hao & Zhongmin Hu & Qun Guo & Kai Di & Shenggong Li, 2019.
"Median to Strong Rainfall Intensity Favors Carbon Sink in a Temperate Grassland Ecosystem in China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-13, November.
- Wang, Chunyu & Li, Sien & Wu, Mousong & Zhang, Wenxin & Guo, Zhenyu & Huang, Siyu & Yang, Danni, 2023.
"Co-regulation of temperature and moisture in the irrigated agricultural ecosystem productivity,"
Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
- Arias, María & Notarnicola, Claudia & Campo-Bescós, Miguel Ángel & Arregui, Luis Miguel & Álvarez-Mozos, Jesús, 2023.
"Evaluation of soil moisture estimation techniques based on Sentinel-1 observations over wheat fields,"
Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:565:y:2019:i:7740:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0848-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.