IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v562y2018i7726d10.1038_s41586-018-0461-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory M. Findlay

    (University of Washington)

  • Riza M. Daza

    (University of Washington)

  • Beth Martin

    (University of Washington)

  • Melissa D. Zhang

    (University of Washington)

  • Anh P. Leith

    (University of Washington)

  • Molly Gasperini

    (University of Washington)

  • Joseph D. Janizek

    (University of Washington)

  • Xingfan Huang

    (University of Washington)

  • Lea M. Starita

    (University of Washington
    Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine)

  • Jay Shendure

    (University of Washington
    Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine
    University of Washington)

Abstract

Variants of uncertain significance fundamentally limit the clinical utility of genetic information. The challenge they pose is epitomized by BRCA1, a tumour suppressor gene in which germline loss-of-function variants predispose women to breast and ovarian cancer. Although BRCA1 has been sequenced in millions of women, the risk associated with most newly observed variants cannot be definitively assigned. Here we use saturation genome editing to assay 96.5% of all possible single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in 13 exons that encode functionally critical domains of BRCA1. Functional effects for nearly 4,000 SNVs are bimodally distributed and almost perfectly concordant with established assessments of pathogenicity. Over 400 non-functional missense SNVs are identified, as well as around 300 SNVs that disrupt expression. We predict that these results will be immediately useful for the clinical interpretation of BRCA1 variants, and that this approach can be extended to overcome the challenge of variants of uncertain significance in additional clinically actionable genes.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory M. Findlay & Riza M. Daza & Beth Martin & Melissa D. Zhang & Anh P. Leith & Molly Gasperini & Joseph D. Janizek & Xingfan Huang & Lea M. Starita & Jay Shendure, 2018. "Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7726), pages 217-222, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:562:y:2018:i:7726:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0461-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0461-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0461-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-018-0461-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth J. Radford & Hong-Kee Tan & Malin H. L. Andersson & James D. Stephenson & Eugene J. Gardner & Holly Ironfield & Andrew J. Waters & Daniel Gitterman & Sarah Lindsay & Federico Abascal & Iñigo, 2023. "Saturation genome editing of DDX3X clarifies pathogenicity of germline and somatic variation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Liselot Dewachter & Aaron N. Brooks & Katherine Noon & Charlotte Cialek & Alia Clark-ElSayed & Thomas Schalck & Nandini Krishnamurthy & Wim Versées & Wim Vranken & Jan Michiels, 2023. "Deep mutational scanning of essential bacterial proteins can guide antibiotic development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. George E. Ronson & Katarzyna Starowicz & Elizabeth J. Anthony & Ann Liza Piberger & Lucy C. Clarke & Alexander J. Garvin & Andrew D. Beggs & Celina M. Whalley & Matthew J. Edmonds & James F. J. Beesle, 2023. "Mechanisms of synthetic lethality between BRCA1/2 and 53BP1 deficiencies and DNA polymerase theta targeting," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Shiqiang Jin & Gyuhyeong Goh, 2021. "Bayesian selection of best subsets via hybrid search," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1991-2007, September.
    5. Zu Ye & Shengfeng Xu & Yin Shi & Xueqian Cheng & Yuan Zhang & Sunetra Roy & Sarita Namjoshi & Michael A. Longo & Todd M. Link & Katharina Schlacher & Guang Peng & Dihua Yu & Bin Wang & John A. Tainer , 2024. "GRB2 stabilizes RAD51 at reversed replication forks suppressing genomic instability and innate immunity against cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Annabel K. Sangree & Audrey L. Griffith & Zsofia M. Szegletes & Priyanka Roy & Peter C. DeWeirdt & Mudra Hegde & Abby V. McGee & Ruth E. Hanna & John G. Doench, 2022. "Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Christoph Klenk & Maria Scrivens & Anina Niederer & Shuying Shi & Loretta Mueller & Elaine Gersz & Maurice Zauderer & Ernest S. Smith & Ralf Strohner & Andreas Plückthun, 2023. "A Vaccinia-based system for directed evolution of GPCRs in mammalian cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Federica Luppino & Ivan A. Adzhubei & Christopher A. Cassa & Agnes Toth-Petroczy, 2023. "DeMAG predicts the effects of variants in clinically actionable genes by integrating structural and evolutionary epistatic features," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Lukas Gerasimavicius & Benjamin J. Livesey & Joseph A. Marsh, 2022. "Loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mutations have profoundly different effects on protein structure," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Luke Hoberecht & Pirunthan Perampalam & Aaron Lun & Jean-Philippe Fortin, 2022. "A comprehensive Bioconductor ecosystem for the design of CRISPR guide RNAs across nucleases and technologies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:562:y:2018:i:7726:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0461-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.