IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v430y2004i7001d10.1038_nature02771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations

Author

Listed:
  • James M. Murphy

    (Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office)

  • David M. H. Sexton

    (Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office)

  • David N. Barnett

    (Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office)

  • Gareth S. Jones

    (Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office)

  • Mark J. Webb

    (Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office)

  • Matthew Collins

    (Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office)

  • David A. Stainforth

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

Comprehensive global climate models1 are the only tools that account for the complex set of processes which will determine future climate change at both a global and regional level. Planners are typically faced with a wide range of predicted changes from different models of unknown relative quality2,3, owing to large but unquantified uncertainties in the modelling process4. Here we report a systematic attempt to determine the range of climate changes consistent with these uncertainties, based on a 53-member ensemble of model versions constructed by varying model parameters. We estimate a probability density function for the sensitivity of climate to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and obtain a 5–95 per cent probability range of 2.4–5.4 °C. Our probability density function is constrained by objective estimates of the relative reliability of different model versions, the choice of model parameters that are varied and their uncertainty ranges, specified on the basis of expert advice. Our ensemble produces a range of regional changes much wider than indicated by traditional methods based on scaling the response patterns of an individual simulation5,6.

Suggested Citation

  • James M. Murphy & David M. H. Sexton & David N. Barnett & Gareth S. Jones & Mark J. Webb & Matthew Collins & David A. Stainforth, 2004. "Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7001), pages 768-772, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:430:y:2004:i:7001:d:10.1038_nature02771
    DOI: 10.1038/nature02771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02771
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature02771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:430:y:2004:i:7001:d:10.1038_nature02771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.