IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v427y2004i6972d10.1038_427312a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive bias and affective state

Author

Listed:
  • Emma J. Harding

    (Centre for Behavioural Biology, University of Bristol)

  • Elizabeth S. Paul

    (Centre for Behavioural Biology, University of Bristol)

  • Michael Mendl

    (Centre for Behavioural Biology, University of Bristol)

Abstract

Information processing by humans can be biased by their emotions — for example, anxious and depressed people tend to make negative judgements about events and to interpret ambiguous stimuli unfavourably1,2,3,4. Here we show that such a 'pessimistic' response bias can also be measured in rats that are housed in unpredictable conditions5,6. Our findings indicate that cognitive bias can be used as an indicator of affective state in animals, which should facilitate progress in animal-welfare studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma J. Harding & Elizabeth S. Paul & Michael Mendl, 2004. "Cognitive bias and affective state," Nature, Nature, vol. 427(6972), pages 312-312, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:427:y:2004:i:6972:d:10.1038_427312a
    DOI: 10.1038/427312a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/427312a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/427312a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neil Garrett & Tali Sharot, 2014. "How Robust Is the Optimistic Update Bias for Estimating Self-Risk and Population Base Rates?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Alessandro V. M. Oliveira & Bruno F. Oliveira & Moises D. Vassallo, 2024. "Airport service quality perception and flight delays: examining the influence of psychosituational latent traits of respondents in passenger satisfaction surveys," Papers 2401.02139, arXiv.org.
    3. Rafal Rygula & Helena Pluta & Piotr Popik, 2012. "Laughing Rats Are Optimistic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-6, December.
    4. Claire A Hales & Emma S J Robinson & Conor J Houghton, 2016. "Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Marko Bračić & Lena Bohn & Viktoria Siewert & Vanessa T von Kortzfleisch & Holger Schielzeth & Sylvia Kaiser & Norbert Sachser & S Helene Richter, 2022. "Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(4), pages 775-788.
    6. Vanessa Kloke & Rebecca S Schreiber & Carina Bodden & Julian Möllers & Hanna Ruhmann & Sylvia Kaiser & Klaus-Peter Lesch & Norbert Sachser & Lars Lewejohann, 2014. "Hope for the Best or Prepare for the Worst? Towards a Spatial Cognitive Bias Test for Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Naïma Kasbaoui & Jonathan Cooper & Daniel S Mills & Oliver Burman, 2016. "Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Sicong Liu & Qingcheng Fan & Shanghao Liu & Chunjiang Zhao, 2022. "DepthFormer: A High-Resolution Depth-Wise Transformer for Animal Pose Estimation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Melissa J Starling & Nicholas Branson & Denis Cody & Timothy R Starling & Paul D McGreevy, 2014. "Canine Sense and Sensibility: Tipping Points and Response Latency Variability as an Optimism Index in a Canine Judgement Bias Assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:427:y:2004:i:6972:d:10.1038_427312a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.