IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v415y2002i6873d10.1038_415731a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits

Author

Listed:
  • Henk F. Moed

    (Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University)

Abstract

Towards a critical, informative, accurate and policy-relevant bibliometrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Henk F. Moed, 2002. "The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6873), pages 731-732, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:415:y:2002:i:6873:d:10.1038_415731a
    DOI: 10.1038/415731a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/415731a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/415731a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Javier Ruiz-Castillo, 2008. "Economics research in Spain during the 1990s: a literature review," Spanish Economic Review, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 221-249, September.
    2. Marcelo Mendoza, 2021. "Differences in Citation Patterns across Areas, Article Types and Age Groups of Researchers," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2006. "La investigación en economía en España durante los años 90 : una revisión de la literatura," DE - Documentos de Trabajo. Economía. DE de060201, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    4. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo & Flavia Di Costa, 2009. "Mapping Excellence in National Research Systems," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 159-188, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:415:y:2002:i:6873:d:10.1038_415731a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.