IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v411y2001i6840d10.1038_35082053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors

Author

Listed:
  • François Lutzoni

    (The Field Museum of Natural History
    Duke University)

  • Mark Pagel

    (School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading)

  • Valérie Reeb

    (The Field Museum of Natural History
    University of Illinois at Chicago (M/C 066)
    Duke University)

Abstract

About one-fifth of all known extant fungal species form obligate symbiotic associations with green algae, cyanobacteria or with both photobionts. These symbioses, known as lichens, are one way for fungi to meet their requirement for carbohydrates1,2. Lichens are widely believed to have arisen independently on several occasions, accounting for the high diversity and mixed occurrence of lichenized and non-lichenized (42 and 58%, respectively) fungal species within the Ascomycota3,4. Depending on the taxonomic classification chosen2,5,6, 15–18 orders of the Ascomycota include lichen-forming taxa, and 8–11 of these orders (representing about 60% of the Ascomycota species) contain both lichenized and non-lichenized species. Here we report a phylogenetic comparative analysis of the Ascomycota, a phylum that includes greater than 98% of known lichenized fungal species5. Using a Bayesian phylogenetic tree sampling methodology7,8 combined with a statistical model of trait evolution9, we take into account uncertainty about the phylogenetic tree and ancestral state reconstructions. Our results show that lichens evolved earlier than believed, and that gains of lichenization have been infrequent during Ascomycota evolution, but have been followed by multiple independent losses of the lichen symbiosis. As a consequence, major Ascomycota lineages of exclusively non-lichen-forming species are derived from lichen-forming ancestors. These species include taxa with important benefits and detriments to humans, such as Penicillium and Aspergillus10,11,12.

Suggested Citation

  • François Lutzoni & Mark Pagel & Valérie Reeb, 2001. "Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6840), pages 937-940, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:411:y:2001:i:6840:d:10.1038_35082053
    DOI: 10.1038/35082053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35082053
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35082053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeffrey B Joy & Richard H Liang & Rosemary M McCloskey & T Nguyen & Art F Y Poon, 2016. "Ancestral Reconstruction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Philipp Resl & Adina R. Bujold & Gulnara Tagirdzhanova & Peter Meidl & Sandra Freire Rallo & Mieko Kono & Samantha Fernández-Brime & Hörður Guðmundsson & Ólafur Sigmar Andrésson & Lucia Muggia & Helmu, 2022. "Large differences in carbohydrate degradation and transport potential among lichen fungal symbionts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:411:y:2001:i:6840:d:10.1038_35082053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.