IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v6y2023i11d10.1038_s41893-023-01185-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycling bias and reduction neglect

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela J. Barnett

    (University of Virginia)

  • Patrick I. Hancock

    (University of Virginia)

  • Leidy E. Klotz

    (University of Virginia)

  • Shahzeen Z. Attari

    (Indiana University Bloomington)

Abstract

Waste generation and mismanagement are polluting the planet at accelerating and unsustainable rates. Reducing waste generation is far more sustainable than managing waste after it has been created, which is why ‘reduce, reuse, recycle’ is ordered the way it is, with reduce first and recycling as a last resort. However, our research finds strong evidence for a recycling bias and reduction neglect. Across two surveys (NTotal = 1,321), most participants perceived recycling as the most sustainable action to manage waste. This error decreased when different waste destinations were emphasized and when choice options were reduced. When asked in study 2 (N = 473), 53.9% of participants recognized that the product design stage offered the greatest potential for mitigating waste and its impacts. However, participants only felt empowered to enact change via their consumption (72.9%) and disposal choices (23.3%). For consumers and producers alike, policies and interventions should motivate source reduction and reuse, which could help correct the misplaced preference for recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela J. Barnett & Patrick I. Hancock & Leidy E. Klotz & Shahzeen Z. Attari, 2023. "Recycling bias and reduction neglect," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1418-1425, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:6:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1038_s41893-023-01185-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01185-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-023-01185-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-023-01185-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:6:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1038_s41893-023-01185-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.