IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v6y2022i7d10.1038_s41562-022-01348-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship

Author

Listed:
  • Amber Hye-Yon Lee

    (University of Pennsylvania
    Ryerson University
    University of Pennsylvania)

  • Yphtach Lelkes

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Carlee B. Hawkins

    (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville)

  • Alexander G. Theodoridis

    (University of Massachusetts Amherst)

Abstract

The dominant narrative among scholars and political pundits characterizes American partisanship as overwhelmingly negative, portraying citizens as more repelled by the opposing party than attached to their own party. To assess the valence of partisan identity, we use various measures collected from several new and existing nationally representative surveys and behavioural outcomes obtained from two experiments. Our findings consistently depart from the negative partisanship narrative. For the majority of Americans, partisanship is either equally positive and negative or more positive than negative. Only partisan leaners stand out as negative partisans. We pair these observational findings with experimental data that differentiate between positive group behaviour and negative group behaviour in the partisan context. We find that the behavioural manifestations of party identity similarly include both positive and negative biases in balance, reinforcing our conclusion that descriptions of partisanship as primarily negative are exaggerated.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber Hye-Yon Lee & Yphtach Lelkes & Carlee B. Hawkins & Alexander G. Theodoridis, 2022. "Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 951-963, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:6:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01348-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01348-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:6:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01348-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.