Author
Listed:
- Anna K. Miller
(Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
- Jacquelaine Bartlett
(Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
- Calvin Pan
(Los Angeles)
- Aldons J. Lusis
(Los Angeles)
- Dana C. Crawford
(Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
- Scott M. Williams
(Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
- David A. Buchner
(Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
Abstract
A better understanding of genetic architecture will help enhance precision medicine and clinical care. Towards this end, we investigate sex-stratified analyses for several traits in the Hybrid Mouse Diversity Panel (HMDP) and UK Biobank to assess trait polygenicity and identify contributing loci. By comparing allelic effect directions in males and females, we hypothesize that non-associated loci should show random effect directions across sexes. Instead, we observe strong concordance in effect direction, even among alleles lacking nominal statistical significance. Our findings suggest hundreds of loci influence each mouse trait and thousands affect each human trait, including traits with no significant loci under conventional approaches. We also detect patterns consistent with spurious widespread epistasis. These results highlight the value of sex-stratified analyses in uncovering novel loci, suggest a method for identifying biologically relevant associations beyond statistical thresholds, and caution that pervasive main effects may produce misleading epistatic signals.
Suggested Citation
Anna K. Miller & Jacquelaine Bartlett & Calvin Pan & Aldons J. Lusis & Dana C. Crawford & Scott M. Williams & David A. Buchner, 2025.
"Concordance between male- and female-specific GWAS results helps define underlying genetic architecture of complex traits,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63763-x
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63763-x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63763-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.