IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-63622-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A basic framework to explain splice-site choice in eukaryotes

Author

Listed:
  • Craig I. Dent

    (Clayton Campus
    Max-Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research)

  • Stefan Prodic

    (Clayton Campus
    Australian National University)

  • Aiswarya Balakrishnan

    (Clayton Campus
    University of Rochester)

  • Aaryan Chhabra

    (Clayton Campus)

  • James D. G. Georges

    (Clayton Campus)

  • Sourav Mukherjee

    (Clayton Campus)

  • Jordyn Coutts

    (Clayton Campus)

  • Michael Gitonobel

    (Clayton Campus)

  • Rucha D. Sarwade

    (Clayton Campus)

  • Joseph Rosenbluh

    (Clayton Campus)

  • Mauro D’Amato

    (LUM University
    CIC bioGUNE – BRTA
    Basque foundation for Science)

  • Partha P. Das

    (Clayton
    Clayton)

  • Ya-Long Guo

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Alexandre Fournier-Level

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Richard Burke

    (Clayton Campus)

  • Sridevi Sureshkumar

    (Clayton Campus)

  • David Powell

    (Clayton Campus)

  • Sureshkumar Balasubramanian

    (Clayton Campus)

Abstract

Changes in splicing can mediate phenotypic variation, ranging from flowering time differences in plants to genetic diseases in humans. Splicing changes occur due to differences in splice-site strength, often influenced by genetic variation and the environment. How genetic variation influences splice-site strength remains poorly understood, largely because splice-site usage across transcriptomes has not been empirically quantified. Here, we quantify the use of individual splice-sites in Arabidopsis, Drosophila and humans and treat these measurements as molecular phenotypes to map variation in splice-site usage through GWAS. We carry out more than 130,000 GWAS with splice-site usage phenotypes, cataloguing genetic variation associated with changes in the usage of individual splice-sites across transcriptomes. We find that most of the common, genetically controlled variation in splicing is cis and there are no major trans hotspots in the three species analyzed. We group splice-sites based on GT[N]4 or [N]4AG sequence, quantify their average use, develop a ranking and show that these hexamer rankings provide a simple and comparable feature across species to explain most of the splice-site choice. Transcriptome analyses in several species suggest that hexamer rankings offer a rule that helps explain splice-site choices, forming a basis for a shared splicing logic in eukaryotes.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig I. Dent & Stefan Prodic & Aiswarya Balakrishnan & Aaryan Chhabra & James D. G. Georges & Sourav Mukherjee & Jordyn Coutts & Michael Gitonobel & Rucha D. Sarwade & Joseph Rosenbluh & Mauro D’Amat, 2025. "A basic framework to explain splice-site choice in eukaryotes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63622-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63622-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63622-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-63622-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63622-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.