Author
Listed:
- François Stockart
(Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC
Yale University)
- Ramla Msheik
(Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC)
- Alexis Robin
(CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm)
- Lenka Jurkovičová
(St. Anne’s University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University
Masaryk University)
- Dorian Goueytes
(Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC
Univ. Lille)
- Martin Rouy
- Radek Mareček
(St. Anne’s University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University
Masaryk University)
- Dominique Hoffmann
(CHU Grenoble Alpes)
- Liad Mudrik
(Tel Aviv University
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR))
- Robert Roman
(St. Anne’s University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University
Masaryk University)
- Milan Brázdil
(St. Anne’s University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University
Masaryk University)
- Lorella Minotti
(CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm)
- Philippe Kahane
(CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm)
- Michael Pereira
(Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm)
- Nathan Faivre
(Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC)
Abstract
Perception is a multi-faceted, dynamical process that can be tackled empirically through measures of stimulus detectability and confidence. We recorded stereo-electroencephalographic data of 29 participants partaking in three pre-registered experiments to assess if evidence accumulation, a form of sequential sampling of sensory evidence, can explain perception. In an immediate-response experiment, high-gamma activity from individual channels and decoded multivariate latent variables in the visual, inferior frontal, and anterior insular cortices display a correlation between the slope of their increase and reaction times. In two further experiments, this signal in the ventral visual cortex differentiates between (1) stimuli reported as seen vs. unseen in delayed detection, (2) high and low intensity stimuli during passive viewing, and (3) levels of confidence when stimuli were detected. A computational model of leaky evidence accumulation can successfully reproduce both behavioral and neural data. Overall, we show that evidence accumulation explains subjective aspects of visual perception.
Suggested Citation
François Stockart & Ramla Msheik & Alexis Robin & Lenka Jurkovičová & Dorian Goueytes & Martin Rouy & Radek Mareček & Dominique Hoffmann & Liad Mudrik & Robert Roman & Milan Brázdil & Lorella Minotti , 2025.
"Cortical evidence accumulation for visual perception occurs irrespective of reports,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63255-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63255-y
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63255-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.