Author
Listed:
- Deepan Balakrishnan
(National University of Singapore
National University of Singapore)
- Anupama Prakash
(National University of Singapore
Imperial College London)
- Benedikt J. Daurer
(Harwell Science & Innovation Campus)
- Cédric Finet
(National University of Singapore)
- Ying Chen Lim
(National University of Singapore
National University of Singapore)
- Zhou Shen
(National University of Singapore
National University of Singapore)
- Pierre Thibault
(Università degli Studi di Trieste)
- Antónia Monteiro
(National University of Singapore)
- N. Duane Loh
(National University of Singapore
National University of Singapore
National University of Singapore)
Abstract
How pigment distribution influences the cuticle density within a microscopic butterfly wing scale, and how both impact each scale’s final reflected color, remains unknown. We use ptychographic X-ray computed tomography to quantitatively determine, at nanoscale resolutions, the three-dimensional mass density of scales with pigmentation differences. By comparing cuticle densities between two pairs of scales with pigmentation differences, we determine that the density of the lower lamina is inversely correlated with pigmentation. In the upper lamina structure of Junonia orithya and Bicyclus anynana, low pigment levels also correlate with sheet-like chitin structures as opposed to rod-like structures. Within each scale, we determine that the lower lamina in all scales has the highest density, and distinct layers within the lower lamina help explain reflected color. We hypothesize that pigments, in addition to absorbing specific wavelengths, can affect cuticle polymerization, density, and refractive index, thereby impacting reflected wavelengths that produce colors.
Suggested Citation
Deepan Balakrishnan & Anupama Prakash & Benedikt J. Daurer & Cédric Finet & Ying Chen Lim & Zhou Shen & Pierre Thibault & Antónia Monteiro & N. Duane Loh, 2025.
"Nanoscale cuticle mass density variations influenced by pigmentation in butterfly wing scales,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-62010-7
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-62010-7
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-62010-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.