Author
Listed:
- Ines Sturmlechner
(Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic)
- Abhinav Jain
(Mayo Clinic)
- Bin Hu
(Stanford University
Palo Alto Veterans Administration Healthcare System)
- Rohit R. Jadhav
(Mayo Clinic
Stanford University
Palo Alto Veterans Administration Healthcare System)
- Wenqiang Cao
(Mayo Clinic
Stanford University
Palo Alto Veterans Administration Healthcare System
Health Sciences Institute of China Medical University)
- Hirohisa Okuyama
(Mayo Clinic)
- Lu Tian
(Stanford University)
- Cornelia M. Weyand
(Mayo Clinic
Stanford University
Mayo Clinic)
- Jörg J. Goronzy
(Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
Stanford University
Palo Alto Veterans Administration Healthcare System)
Abstract
Memory T cells are a highly heterogeneous collection of antigen-experienced cells that undergo dynamic adaptations upon antigen re-encounter and environmental signals. This heterogeneity hinders studies on memory T cell durability and age-related dysfunction. Using chronic Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and barcode-enabled antigen tracing, we assess the influence of age on memory states at the level of single antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. In young adults ( 65-years), antigen-specific cells show largely distinct phenotypic and transcriptomic aging trajectories. Common to many albeit not all antigen-specific populations are maintained TCR diversity, gained natural killer cell-like, innate signatures and lost stem-like features while no evidence is seen for cellular senescence or exhaustion. TCR avidity contributes to these phenotypic differences and aging-related changes. Collectively, our data uncover divergent antigen-guided aging shifts in memory T cell phenotypes, which are informative for antigen selection in optimizing vaccine design and adoptive T cell therapy.
Suggested Citation
Ines Sturmlechner & Abhinav Jain & Bin Hu & Rohit R. Jadhav & Wenqiang Cao & Hirohisa Okuyama & Lu Tian & Cornelia M. Weyand & Jörg J. Goronzy, 2025.
"Antigen specificity shapes distinct aging trajectories of memory CD8⁺ T cells,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61627-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61627-y
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61627-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.