Author
Listed:
- Mangalakumari Jeyanathan
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Sam Afkhami
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Michael R. D’Agostino
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Imran Satia
(McMaster University)
- Dominik K. Fritz
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Kate Miyasaki
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Jann C. Ang
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Anna Zganiacz
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Karen J. Howie
(McMaster University)
- Marilyn Swinton
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Emilio Aguirre
(McMaster University)
- Michael B. Zheng
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Natallia Kazhdan
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Anna Dvorkin-Gheva
(McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Lawrence Mbuagbaw
(McMaster University)
- Maria Fe C. Medina
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Nermin Diab
(McMaster University)
- Danica L. Brister
(McMaster University)
- Gail M. Gauvreau
(McMaster University)
- Brian D. Lichty
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Matthew S. Miller
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Fiona Smaill
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
- Zhou Xing
(McMaster University
McMaster University
McMaster University)
Abstract
The current COVID-19 vaccines are suboptimal against the evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants, particularly in high-risk populations. A next-generation vaccine strategy capable of effective induction of respiratory mucosal immunity remains to be clinically developed. Here, we report an open-label, multi-arm phase 1 study (NCT05094609) to evaluate a multi-antigenic COVID-19 vaccine delivered once via inhaled aerosol to the lung of intramuscular mRNA-vaccinated humans without or with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (uninfected vs infected). Escalating doses of a human adenoviral (HuAd)-vectored or chimpanzee Ad (ChAd)-vectored vaccine are evaluated in the uninfected cohort. A selected Ad vaccine is further evaluated in the infected cohort. The safety is assessed as a primary outcome. Ag-specific immune responses (secondary outcome) are assessed in peripheral blood and in respiratory tract via bronchoscopy at baseline and at timepoint(s) post-vaccination. Eighteen-65-year-old, healthy participants who have received at least 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine are enrolled with those vaccinated with any Ad-vectored COVID-19 vaccine excluded. At baseline, there is minimally detectable mucosal immunity in the lung of uninfected or infected humans. While all tested doses (1 × 105 to 1 × 108 TCID50) of HuAd and ChAd vaccines are safe, ChAd vaccine markedly outperforms the HuAd counterpart in immunogenicity. Thus, an optimal aerosol dose of ChAd vaccine induces the tripartite respiratory mucosal immunity consisting of T cell, trained innate and antibody immunity. Our study thus presents a promising next-generation aerosol COVID-19 vaccine strategy for further clinical development.
Suggested Citation
Mangalakumari Jeyanathan & Sam Afkhami & Michael R. D’Agostino & Imran Satia & Dominik K. Fritz & Kate Miyasaki & Jann C. Ang & Anna Zganiacz & Karen J. Howie & Marilyn Swinton & Emilio Aguirre & Mich, 2025.
"Induction of lung mucosal immunity by a next-generation inhaled aerosol COVID-19 vaccine: an open-label, multi-arm phase 1 clinical trial,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60726-0
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-60726-0
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60726-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.