IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-60434-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing and improving reliability of neighbor embedding methods: a map-continuity perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhexuan Liu

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Rong Ma

    (Harvard University
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Yiqiao Zhong

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Abstract

Visualizing high-dimensional data is essential for understanding biomedical data and deep learning models. Neighbor embedding methods, such as t-SNE and UMAP, are widely used but can introduce misleading visual artifacts. We find that the manifold learning interpretations from many prior works are inaccurate and that the misuse stems from a lack of data-independent notions of embedding maps, which project high-dimensional data into a lower-dimensional space. Leveraging the leave-one-out principle, we introduce LOO-map, a framework that extends embedding maps beyond discrete points to the entire input space. We identify two forms of map discontinuity that distort visualizations: one exaggerates cluster separation and the other creates spurious local structures. As a remedy, we develop two types of point-wise diagnostic scores to detect unreliable embedding points and improve hyperparameter selection, which are validated on datasets from computer vision and single-cell omics.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhexuan Liu & Rong Ma & Yiqiao Zhong, 2025. "Assessing and improving reliability of neighbor embedding methods: a map-continuity perspective," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60434-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-60434-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60434-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-60434-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60434-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.