IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-58796-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A clinical benchmark of public self-supervised pathology foundation models

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Campanella

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Shengjia Chen

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Manbir Singh

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Ruchika Verma

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Silke Muehlstedt

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Jennifer Zeng

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Aryeh Stock

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Matt Croken

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Brandon Veremis

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Abdulkadir Elmas

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Ivan Shujski

    (Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    University of Gothenburg)

  • Noora Neittaanmäki

    (Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    University of Gothenburg)

  • Kuan-lin Huang

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Ricky Kwan

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Jane Houldsworth

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Adam J. Schoenfeld

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Chad Vanderbilt

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

Abstract

The use of self-supervised learning to train pathology foundation models has increased substantially in the past few years. Notably, several models trained on large quantities of clinical data have been made publicly available in recent months. This will significantly enhance scientific research in computational pathology and help bridge the gap between research and clinical deployment. With the increase in availability of public foundation models of different sizes, trained using different algorithms on different datasets, it becomes important to establish a benchmark to compare the performance of such models on a variety of clinically relevant tasks spanning multiple organs and diseases. In this work, we present a collection of pathology datasets comprising clinical slides associated with clinically relevant endpoints including cancer diagnoses and a variety of biomarkers generated during standard hospital operation from three medical centers. We leverage these datasets to systematically assess the performance of public pathology foundation models and provide insights into best practices for training foundation models and selecting appropriate pretrained models. To enable the community to evaluate their models on our clinical datasets, we make available an automated benchmarking pipeline for external use.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Campanella & Shengjia Chen & Manbir Singh & Ruchika Verma & Silke Muehlstedt & Jennifer Zeng & Aryeh Stock & Matt Croken & Brandon Veremis & Abdulkadir Elmas & Ivan Shujski & Noora Neittaanmä, 2025. "A clinical benchmark of public self-supervised pathology foundation models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58796-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58796-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58796-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-58796-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanwen Xu & Naoto Usuyama & Jaspreet Bagga & Sheng Zhang & Rajesh Rao & Tristan Naumann & Cliff Wong & Zelalem Gero & Javier González & Yu Gu & Yanbo Xu & Mu Wei & Wenhui Wang & Shuming Ma & Furu Wei , 2024. "A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data," Nature, Nature, vol. 630(8015), pages 181-188, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhilong Weng & Alexander Seper & Alexey Pryalukhin & Fabian Mairinger & Claudia Wickenhauser & Marcus Bauer & Lennert Glamann & Hendrik Bläker & Thomas Lingscheidt & Wolfgang Hulla & Danny Jonigk & Si, 2024. "GrandQC: A comprehensive solution to quality control problem in digital pathology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Eduard Chelebian & Christophe Avenel & Carolina Wählby, 2025. "Combining spatial transcriptomics with tissue morphology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Luyang Luo & Mingxiang Wu & Mei Li & Yi Xin & Qiong Wang & Varut Vardhanabhuti & Winnie CW Chu & Zhenhui Li & Juan Zhou & Pranav Rajpurkar & Hao Chen, 2025. "A large model for non-invasive and personalized management of breast cancer from multiparametric MRI," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Juan Manuel Zambrano Chaves & Shih-Cheng Huang & Yanbo Xu & Hanwen Xu & Naoto Usuyama & Sheng Zhang & Fei Wang & Yujia Xie & Mahmoud Khademi & Ziyi Yang & Hany Awadalla & Julia Gong & Houdong Hu & Jia, 2025. "A clinically accessible small multimodal radiology model and evaluation metric for chest X-ray findings," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Zhaochang Yang & Ting Wei & Ying Liang & Xin Yuan & RuiTian Gao & Yujia Xia & Jie Zhou & Yue Zhang & Zhangsheng Yu, 2025. "A foundation model for generalizable cancer diagnosis and survival prediction from histopathological images," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58796-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.