IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-43607-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Volcaniclastic density currents explain widespread and diverse seafloor impacts of the 2022 Hunga Volcano eruption

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Seabrook

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research)

  • Kevin Mackay

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research)

  • Sally J. Watson

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
    University of Auckland)

  • Michael A. Clare

    (National Oceanography Centre, European Way)

  • James E. Hunt

    (National Oceanography Centre, European Way)

  • Isobel A. Yeo

    (National Oceanography Centre, European Way)

  • Emily M. Lane

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research)

  • Malcolm R. Clark

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research)

  • Richard Wysoczanski

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research)

  • Ashley A. Rowden

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
    Victoria University of Wellington)

  • Taaniela Kula

    (Natural Resources Division/Tonga Geological Services)

  • Linn J. Hoffmann

    (University of Otago)

  • Evelyn Armstrong

    (NIWA/University of Otago Research Centre for Oceanography, University of Otago)

  • Michael J. M. Williams

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research)

Abstract

The impacts of large terrestrial volcanic eruptions are apparent from satellite monitoring and direct observations. However, more than three quarters of all volcanic outputs worldwide lie submerged beneath the ocean, and the risks they pose to people, infrastructure, and benthic ecosystems remain poorly understood due to inaccessibility and a lack of detailed observations before and after eruptions. Here, comparing data acquired between 2015 - 2017 and 3 months after the January 2022 eruption of Hunga Volcano, we document the far-reaching and diverse impacts of one of the most explosive volcanic eruptions ever recorded. Almost 10 km3 of seafloor material was removed during the eruption, most of which we conclude was redeposited within 20 km of the caldera by long run-out seafloor density currents. These powerful currents damaged seafloor cables over a length of >100 km, reshaped the seafloor, and caused mass-mortality of seafloor life. Biological (mega-epifaunal invertebrate) seafloor communities only survived the eruption where local topography provided a physical barrier to density currents (e.g., on nearby seamounts). While the longer-term consequences of such a large eruption for human, ecological and climatic systems are emerging, we expect that these previously-undocumented refugia will play a key role in longer-term ecosystem recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Seabrook & Kevin Mackay & Sally J. Watson & Michael A. Clare & James E. Hunt & Isobel A. Yeo & Emily M. Lane & Malcolm R. Clark & Richard Wysoczanski & Ashley A. Rowden & Taaniela Kula & Linn J., 2023. "Volcaniclastic density currents explain widespread and diverse seafloor impacts of the 2022 Hunga Volcano eruption," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-43607-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43607-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-43607-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-43607-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Timmreck, 2012. "Modeling the climatic effects of large explosive volcanic eruptions," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(6), pages 545-564, November.
    2. Andrew J. Watson, 1997. "Volcanic iron, CO2, ocean productivity and climate," Nature, Nature, vol. 385(6617), pages 587-588, February.
    3. Christopher John Stevenson & Peter Feldens & Aggeliki Georgiopoulou & Mischa Schӧnke & Sebastian Krastel & David J. W. Piper & Katja Lindhorst & David Mosher, 2018. "Reconstructing the sediment concentration of a giant submarine gravity flow," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    4. Patrick Lynett & Maile McCann & Zili Zhou & Willington Renteria & Jose Borrero & Dougal Greer & Ofa Fa’anunu & Cyprien Bosserelle & Bruce Jaffe & SeanPaul La Selle & Andrew Ritchie & Alexander Snyder , 2022. "Diverse tsunamigenesis triggered by the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai eruption," Nature, Nature, vol. 609(7928), pages 728-733, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fred Singer, 1998. "Unfinished Business – The Scientific Case against the Global Climate Treaty," Energy & Environment, , vol. 9(6), pages 617-632, September.
    2. Seth D. Baum, 2023. "Assessing natural global catastrophic risks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(3), pages 2699-2719, February.
    3. Chenyu Zhu & Zhengyu Liu & Shaoqing Zhang & Lixin Wu, 2023. "Likely accelerated weakening of Atlantic overturning circulation emerges in optimal salinity fingerprint," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Abdul Wahab & David C. Hoyal & Mrugesh Shringarpure & Kyle M. Straub, 2022. "A dimensionless framework for predicting submarine fan morphology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Ashutosh Mishra, 2018. "Impact of Natural Short-Term Climate Forcing on India`s Climate," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 59-64, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-43607-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.