IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-41802-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient plant genome engineering using a probiotic sourced CRISPR-Cas9 system

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaohui Zhong

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
    Southwest University)

  • Guanqing Liu

    (Agricultural College of Yangzhou University
    Yangzhou University
    Yangzhou University)

  • Zhongjie Tang

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Shuyue Xiang

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Liang Yang

    (Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Variety Improvement Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province)

  • Lan Huang

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Yao He

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Tingting Fan

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Shishi Liu

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Xuelian Zheng

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
    Southwest University)

  • Tao Zhang

    (Agricultural College of Yangzhou University
    Yangzhou University
    Yangzhou University)

  • Yiping Qi

    (University of Maryland
    University of Maryland)

  • Jian Huang

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Yong Zhang

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
    Southwest University)

Abstract

Among CRISPR-Cas genome editing systems, Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9), sourced from a human pathogen, is the most widely used. Here, through in silico data mining, we have established an efficient plant genome engineering system using CRISPR-Cas9 from probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus. We have confirmed the predicted 5’-NGAAA-3’ PAM via a bacterial PAM depletion assay and showcased its exceptional editing efficiency in rice, wheat, tomato, and Larix cells, surpassing LbCas12a, SpCas9-NG, and SpRY when targeting the identical sequences. In stable rice lines, LrCas9 facilitates multiplexed gene knockout through coding sequence editing and achieves gene knockdown via targeted promoter deletion, demonstrating high specificity. We have also developed LrCas9-derived cytosine and adenine base editors, expanding base editing capabilities. Finally, by harnessing LrCas9’s A/T-rich PAM targeting preference, we have created efficient CRISPR interference and activation systems in plants. Together, our work establishes CRISPR-LrCas9 as an efficient and user-friendly genome engineering tool for diverse applications in crops and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaohui Zhong & Guanqing Liu & Zhongjie Tang & Shuyue Xiang & Liang Yang & Lan Huang & Yao He & Tingting Fan & Shishi Liu & Xuelian Zheng & Tao Zhang & Yiping Qi & Jian Huang & Yong Zhang, 2023. "Efficient plant genome engineering using a probiotic sourced CRISPR-Cas9 system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41802-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41802-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41802-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-41802-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnny H. Hu & Shannon M. Miller & Maarten H. Geurts & Weixin Tang & Liwei Chen & Ning Sun & Christina M. Zeina & Xue Gao & Holly A. Rees & Zhi Lin & David R. Liu, 2018. "Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity," Nature, Nature, vol. 556(7699), pages 57-63, April.
    2. F. Ann Ran & Le Cong & Winston X. Yan & David A. Scott & Jonathan S. Gootenberg & Andrea J. Kriz & Bernd Zetsche & Ophir Shalem & Xuebing Wu & Kira S. Makarova & Eugene V. Koonin & Phillip A. Sharp & , 2015. "In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7546), pages 186-191, April.
    3. Eunji Kim & Taeyoung Koo & Sung Wook Park & Daesik Kim & Kyoungmi Kim & Hee-Yeon Cho & Dong Woo Song & Kyu Jun Lee & Min Hee Jung & Seokjoong Kim & Jin Hyoung Kim & Jeong Hun Kim & Jin-Soo Kim, 2017. "In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Zifeng Cui & Rui Tian & Zhaoyue Huang & Zhuang Jin & Lifang Li & Jiashuo Liu & Zheying Huang & Hongxian Xie & Dan Liu & Haiyan Mo & Rong Zhou & Bin Lang & Bo Meng & Haiyan Weng & Zheng Hu, 2022. "FrCas9 is a CRISPR/Cas9 system with high editing efficiency and fidelity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Benjamin P. Kleinstiver & Michelle S. Prew & Shengdar Q. Tsai & Ved V. Topkar & Nhu T. Nguyen & Zongli Zheng & Andrew P. W. Gonzales & Zhuyun Li & Randall T. Peterson & Jing-Ruey Joanna Yeh & Martin J, 2015. "Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities," Nature, Nature, vol. 523(7561), pages 481-485, July.
    6. Andrew V. Anzalone & Peyton B. Randolph & Jessie R. Davis & Alexander A. Sousa & Luke W. Koblan & Jonathan M. Levy & Peter J. Chen & Christopher Wilson & Gregory A. Newby & Aditya Raguram & David R. L, 2019. "Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA," Nature, Nature, vol. 576(7785), pages 149-157, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maarten H. Geurts & Shashank Gandhi & Matteo G. Boretto & Ninouk Akkerman & Lucca L. M. Derks & Gijs Son & Martina Celotti & Sarina Harshuk-Shabso & Flavia Peci & Harry Begthel & Delilah Hendriks & Pa, 2023. "One-step generation of tumor models by base editor multiplexing in adult stem cell-derived organoids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Raed Ibraheim & Phillip W. L. Tai & Aamir Mir & Nida Javeed & Jiaming Wang & Tomás C. Rodríguez & Suk Namkung & Samantha Nelson & Eraj Shafiq Khokhar & Esther Mintzer & Stacy Maitland & Zexiang Chen &, 2021. "Self-inactivating, all-in-one AAV vectors for precision Cas9 genome editing via homology-directed repair in vivo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Jian Wang & Yuxi Teng & Ruihua Zhang & Yifei Wu & Lei Lou & Yusong Zou & Michelle Li & Zhong-Ru Xie & Yajun Yan, 2021. "Engineering a PAM-flexible SpdCas9 variant as a universal gene repressor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Péter István Kulcsár & András Tálas & Zoltán Ligeti & Eszter Tóth & Zsófia Rakvács & Zsuzsa Bartos & Sarah Laura Krausz & Ágnes Welker & Vanessza Laura Végi & Krisztina Huszár & Ervin Welker, 2023. "A cleavage rule for selection of increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants with high efficiency and no detectable off-targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Dawn G. L. Thean & Hoi Yee Chu & John H. C. Fong & Becky K. C. Chan & Peng Zhou & Cynthia C. S. Kwok & Yee Man Chan & Silvia Y. L. Mak & Gigi C. G. Choi & Joshua W. K. Ho & Zongli Zheng & Alan S. L. W, 2022. "Machine learning-coupled combinatorial mutagenesis enables resource-efficient engineering of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editor activities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Fang Liang & Yu Zhang & Lin Li & Yexin Yang & Ji-Feng Fei & Yanmei Liu & Wei Qin, 2022. "SpG and SpRY variants expand the CRISPR toolbox for genome editing in zebrafish," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Marion Rosello & Malo Serafini & Luca Mignani & Dario Finazzi & Carine Giovannangeli & Marina C. Mione & Jean-Paul Concordet & Filippo Del Bene, 2022. "Disease modeling by efficient genome editing using a near PAM-less base editor in vivo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Hongzhi Zeng & Qichen Yuan & Fei Peng & Dacheng Ma & Ananya Lingineni & Kelly Chee & Peretz Gilberd & Emmanuel C. Osikpa & Zheng Sun & Xue Gao, 2023. "A split and inducible adenine base editor for precise in vivo base editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Giulia I. Corsi & Kunli Qu & Ferhat Alkan & Xiaoguang Pan & Yonglun Luo & Jan Gorodkin, 2022. "CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA activity depends on free energy changes and on the target PAM context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Zeyu Lu & Lingtian Zhang & Qing Mu & Junyang Liu & Yu Chen & Haoyuan Wang & Yanjun Zhang & Rui Su & Ruijun Wang & Zhiying Wang & Qi Lv & Zhihong Liu & Jiasen Liu & Yunhua Li & Yanhong Zhao, 2024. "Progress in Research and Prospects for Application of Precision Gene-Editing Technology Based on CRISPR–Cas9 in the Genetic Improvement of Sheep and Goats," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Lin Zhao & Sabrina R. T. Koseki & Rachel A. Silverstein & Nadia Amrani & Christina Peng & Christian Kramme & Natasha Savic & Martin Pacesa & Tomás C. Rodríguez & Teodora Stan & Emma Tysinger & Lauren , 2023. "PAM-flexible genome editing with an engineered chimeric Cas9," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    12. Jeremy Vicencio & Carlos Sánchez-Bolaños & Ismael Moreno-Sánchez & David Brena & Charles E. Vejnar & Dmytro Kukhtar & Miguel Ruiz-López & Mariona Cots-Ponjoan & Alejandro Rubio & Natalia Rodrigo Meler, 2022. "Genome editing in animals with minimal PAM CRISPR-Cas9 enzymes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Xiaoguang Pan & Kunli Qu & Hao Yuan & Xi Xiang & Christian Anthon & Liubov Pashkova & Xue Liang & Peng Han & Giulia I. Corsi & Fengping Xu & Ping Liu & Jiayan Zhong & Yan Zhou & Tao Ma & Hui Jiang & J, 2022. "Massively targeted evaluation of therapeutic CRISPR off-targets in cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Luke Hoberecht & Pirunthan Perampalam & Aaron Lun & Jean-Philippe Fortin, 2022. "A comprehensive Bioconductor ecosystem for the design of CRISPR guide RNAs across nucleases and technologies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Annabel K. Sangree & Audrey L. Griffith & Zsofia M. Szegletes & Priyanka Roy & Peter C. DeWeirdt & Mudra Hegde & Abby V. McGee & Ruth E. Hanna & John G. Doench, 2022. "Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Shiran Abadi & Winston X Yan & David Amar & Itay Mayrose, 2017. "A machine learning approach for predicting CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiencies and patterns underlying its mechanism of action," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Shunsuke Kawasaki & Hiroki Ono & Moe Hirosawa & Takeru Kuwabara & Shunsuke Sumi & Suji Lee & Knut Woltjen & Hirohide Saito, 2023. "Programmable mammalian translational modulators by CRISPR-associated proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Lisa Maria Riedmayr & Klara Sonnie Hinrichsmeyer & Stefan Bernhard Thalhammer & David Manuel Mittas & Nina Karguth & Dina Yehia Otify & Sybille Böhm & Valentin Johannes Weber & Michael David Bartosche, 2023. "mRNA trans-splicing dual AAV vectors for (epi)genome editing and gene therapy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Tian Zhou & Xinyi Zhu & Zhizhong Ye & Yong-Fei Wang & Chao Yao & Ning Xu & Mi Zhou & Jianyang Ma & Yuting Qin & Yiwei Shen & Yuanjia Tang & Zhihua Yin & Hong Xu & Yutong Zhang & Xiaoli Zang & Huihua D, 2022. "Lupus enhancer risk variant causes dysregulation of IRF8 through cooperative lncRNA and DNA methylation machinery," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Guiquan Zhang & Yao Liu & Shisheng Huang & Shiyuan Qu & Daolin Cheng & Yuan Yao & Quanjiang Ji & Xiaolong Wang & Xingxu Huang & Jianghuai Liu, 2022. "Enhancement of prime editing via xrRNA motif-joined pegRNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41802-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.