IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-29318-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Donut-like organization of inhibition underlies categorical neural responses in the midbrain

Author

Listed:
  • Nagaraj R. Mahajan

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Shreesh P. Mysore

    (Johns Hopkins University
    Johns Hopkins University)

Abstract

Categorical neural responses underlie various forms of selection and decision-making. Such binary-like responses promote robust signaling of the winner in the presence of input ambiguity and neural noise. Here, we show that a ‘donut-like’ inhibitory mechanism in which each competing option suppresses all options except itself, is highly effective at generating categorical neural responses. It surpasses motifs of feedback inhibition, recurrent excitation, and divisive normalization invoked frequently in decision-making models. We demonstrate experimentally not only that this mechanism operates in the midbrain spatial selection network in barn owls, but also that it is necessary for categorical signaling by it. The functional pattern of neural inhibition in the midbrain forms an exquisitely structured ‘multi-holed’ donut consistent with this network’s combinatorial inhibitory function for stimulus selection. Additionally, modeling reveals a generalizable neural implementation of the donut-like motif for categorical selection. Self-sparing inhibition may, therefore, be a powerful circuit module central to categorization.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagaraj R. Mahajan & Shreesh P. Mysore, 2022. "Donut-like organization of inhibition underlies categorical neural responses in the midbrain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-29318-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29318-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-29318-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-29318-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jörn Niessing & Rainer W. Friedrich, 2010. "Olfactory pattern classification by discrete neuronal network states," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7294), pages 47-52, May.
    2. Valerio Mante & David Sussillo & Krishna V. Shenoy & William T. Newsome, 2013. "Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 503(7474), pages 78-84, November.
    3. Camillo Padoa-Schioppa & John A. Assad, 2006. "Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7090), pages 223-226, May.
    4. Jonathan P. Fadok & Sabine Krabbe & Milica Markovic & Julien Courtin & Chun Xu & Lema Massi & Paolo Botta & Kristine Bylund & Christian Müller & Aleksandar Kovacevic & Philip Tovote & Andreas Lüthi, 2017. "A competitive inhibitory circuit for selection of active and passive fear responses," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7639), pages 96-100, February.
    5. David J. Freedman & John A. Assad, 2006. "Experience-dependent representation of visual categories in parietal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7107), pages 85-88, September.
    6. Tatiana A. Engel & Warasinee Chaisangmongkon & David J. Freedman & Xiao-Jing Wang, 2015. "Choice-correlated activity fluctuations underlie learning of neuronal category representation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, May.
    7. Ali Asadollahi & Eric I. Knudsen, 2016. "Spatially precise visual gain control mediated by a cholinergic circuit in the midbrain attention network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Junya Hirokawa & Alexander Vaughan & Paul Masset & Torben Ott & Adam Kepecs, 2019. "Frontal cortex neuron types categorically encode single decision variables," Nature, Nature, vol. 576(7787), pages 446-451, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannah M. Schryver & Shreesh P. Mysore, 2023. "Distinct neural mechanisms construct classical versus extraclassical inhibitory surrounds in an inhibitory nucleus in the midbrain attention network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wan-Yu Shih & Hsiang-Yu Yu & Cheng-Chia Lee & Chien-Chen Chou & Chien Chen & Paul W. Glimcher & Shih-Wei Wu, 2023. "Electrophysiological population dynamics reveal context dependencies during decision making in human frontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Wenyi Zhang & Yang Xie & Tianming Yang, 2022. "Reward salience but not spatial attention dominates the value representation in the orbitofrontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Arno Onken & Jue Xie & Stefano Panzeri & Camillo Padoa-Schioppa, 2019. "Categorical encoding of decision variables in orbitofrontal cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Shinichiro Kira & Houman Safaai & Ari S. Morcos & Stefano Panzeri & Christopher D. Harvey, 2023. "A distributed and efficient population code of mixed selectivity neurons for flexible navigation decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Joao Barbosa & Rémi Proville & Chris C. Rodgers & Michael R. DeWeese & Srdjan Ostojic & Yves Boubenec, 2023. "Early selection of task-relevant features through population gating," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Nir Moneta & Mona M. Garvert & Hauke R. Heekeren & Nicolas W. Schuck, 2023. "Task state representations in vmPFC mediate relevant and irrelevant value signals and their behavioral influence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Huanyuan Zhou & KongFatt Wong-Lin & Da-Hui Wang, 2018. "Parallel Excitatory and Inhibitory Neural Circuit Pathways Underlie Reward-Based Phasic Neural Responses," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-20, April.
    8. Kiyohito Iigaya & Sanghyun Yi & Iman A. Wahle & Sandy Tanwisuth & Logan Cross & John P. O’Doherty, 2023. "Neural mechanisms underlying the hierarchical construction of perceived aesthetic value," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Alcocer, Christian Diego & Jeitschko, Thomas D. & Shupp, Robert, 2020. "Naive and sophisticated mixing: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 157-173.
    10. Laurette Dubé & Antoine Bechara & Ulf Böckenholt & Asim Ansari & Alain Dagher & Mark Daniel & Wayne DeSarbo & Lesley Fellows & Ross Hammond & Terry Huang & Scott Huettel & Yan Kestens & Bärbel Knäuper, 2009. "Towards a brain-to-society systems model of individual choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 105-106, March.
    11. Alvino, Letizia & Constantinides, Efthymios & Franco, Massimo, 2018. "Towards a better understanding of consumer behavior : Marginal utility as a parameter in neuromarketing research," Other publications TiSEM b3e61951-9032-4cb4-b075-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Jan Weber & Anne-Kristin Solbakk & Alejandro O. Blenkmann & Anais Llorens & Ingrid Funderud & Sabine Leske & Pål Gunnar Larsson & Jugoslav Ivanovic & Robert T. Knight & Tor Endestad & Randolph F. Helf, 2024. "Ramping dynamics and theta oscillations reflect dissociable signatures during rule-guided human behavior," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Letizia Alvino & Efthymios Constantinides & Massimo Franco, 2018. "Towards a Better Understanding of Consumer Behavior: Marginal Utility as a Parameter in Neuromarketing Research," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 90-106, March.
    14. Pierre O. Boucher & Tian Wang & Laura Carceroni & Gary Kane & Krishna V. Shenoy & Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, 2023. "Initial conditions combine with sensory evidence to induce decision-related dynamics in premotor cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    15. Rishi Rajalingham & Aída Piccato & Mehrdad Jazayeri, 2022. "Recurrent neural networks with explicit representation of dynamic latent variables can mimic behavioral patterns in a physical inference task," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Ryan Webb & Paul W. Glimcher & Kenway Louie, 2021. "The Normalization of Consumer Valuations: Context-Dependent Preferences from Neurobiological Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 93-125, January.
    17. Pan Xu & Yuanlei Yue & Juntao Su & Xiaoqian Sun & Hongfei Du & Zhichao Liu & Rahul Simha & Jianhui Zhou & Chen Zeng & Hui Lu, 2022. "Pattern decorrelation in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex enables social preference and requires MeCP2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Dickhaut, John & Smith, Vernon & Xin, Baohua & Rustichini, Aldo, 2013. "Human economic choice as costly information processing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 206-221.
    19. Bruno B Averbeck & Moonsang Seo, 2008. "The Statistical Neuroanatomy of Frontal Networks in the Macaque," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, April.
    20. Brocas, Isabelle & Carrillo, Juan D., 2012. "From perception to action: An economic model of brain processes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 81-103.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-29318-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.