IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-28432-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In-degree centrality in a social network is linked to coordinated neural activity

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa C. Baek

    (University of California, Los Angeles)

  • Ryan Hyon

    (University of California, Los Angeles)

  • Karina López

    (University of California, Los Angeles)

  • Emily S. Finn

    (Dartmouth College)

  • Mason A. Porter

    (University of California, Los Angeles
    Sante Fe Institute)

  • Carolyn Parkinson

    (University of California, Los Angeles
    Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles)

Abstract

Convergent processing of the world may be a factor that contributes to social connectedness. We use neuroimaging and network analysis to investigate the association between the social-network position (as measured by in-degree centrality) of first-year university students and their neural similarity while watching naturalistic audio-visual stimuli (specifically, videos). There were 119 students in the social-network study; 63 of them participated in the neuroimaging study. We show that more central individuals had similar neural responses to their peers and to each other in brain regions that are associated with high-level interpretations and social cognition (e.g., in the default mode network), whereas less-central individuals exhibited more variable responses. Self-reported enjoyment of and interest in stimuli followed a similar pattern, but accounting for these data did not change our main results. These findings show that neural processing of external stimuli is similar in highly-central individuals but is idiosyncratic in less-central individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa C. Baek & Ryan Hyon & Karina López & Emily S. Finn & Mason A. Porter & Carolyn Parkinson, 2022. "In-degree centrality in a social network is linked to coordinated neural activity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-28432-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28432-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28432-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-28432-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coren L. Apicella & Frank W. Marlowe & James H. Fowler & Nicholas A. Christakis, 2012. "Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers," Nature, Nature, vol. 481(7382), pages 497-501, January.
    2. Carolyn Parkinson & Adam M. Kleinbaum & Thalia Wheatley, 2018. "Similar neural responses predict friendship," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Emily S. Finn & Philip R. Corlett & Gang Chen & Peter A. Bandettini & R. Todd Constable, 2018. "Trait paranoia shapes inter-subject synchrony in brain activity during an ambiguous social narrative," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Carolyn Parkinson & Adam M. Kleinbaum & Thalia Wheatley, 2017. "Spontaneous neural encoding of social network position," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 1-7, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity," CeMMAP working papers 08/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Gabriele Chierchia & Fabio Tufano & Giorgio Coricelli, 2017. "Friends or Strangers? Strategic Uncertainty and Cooperation across Experimental Games of Strategic Complements and Substitutes," Discussion Papers 2017-03, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    3. José Ignacio Santos & María Pereda & Débora Zurro & Myrian Álvarez & Jorge Caro & José Manuel Galán & Ivan Briz i Godino, 2015. "Effect of Resource Spatial Correlation and Hunter-Fisher-Gatherer Mobility on Social Cooperation in Tierra del Fuego," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Zixuan Tang & Chen Qu & Yang Hu & Julien Benistant & Frederic Moisan & Edmund Derrington & Jean-Claude Dreher, 2023. "Strengths of social ties modulate brain computations for third-party punishment," Post-Print hal-04325737, HAL.
    5. Burton-Chellew, Maxwell, 2022. "The restart effect in social dilemmas shows humans are self-interested not altruistic," SocArXiv hgznu, Center for Open Science.
    6. Siobhán M. Mattison & Neil G. MacLaren & Ruizhe Liu & Adam Z. Reynolds & Gabrielle D. Baca & Peter M. Mattison & Meng Zhang & Chun-Yi Sum & Mary K. Shenk & Tami Blumenfield & Christopher von Rueden & , 2021. "Gender Differences in Social Networks Based on Prevailing Kinship Norms in the Mosuo of China," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Huang, Keke & Zheng, Xiaoping & Yang, Yeqing & Wang, Tao, 2015. "Behavioral evolution in evacuation crowd based on heterogeneous rationality of small groups," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 501-506.
    8. Gabriele Chierchia & Fabio Tufano & Giorgio Coricelli, 2020. "The differential impact of friendship on cooperative and competitive coordination," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 423-452, November.
    9. Perkins, Jessica M. & Subramanian, S.V. & Christakis, Nicholas A., 2015. "Social networks and health: A systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 60-78.
    10. Jelena Grujić & Torsten Röhl & Dirk Semmann & Manfred Milinski & Arne Traulsen, 2012. "Consistent Strategy Updating in Spatial and Non-Spatial Behavioral Experiments Does Not Promote Cooperation in Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-8, November.
    11. Marco Battaglini & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza & Eleonora Patacchini, 2020. "Effectiveness of Connected Legislators," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 739-756, October.
    12. Centofanti, Tiziana & Murugesan, Anand, 2022. "Leader and citizens participation for the environment: Experimental evidence from Eastern Europe," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    13. Enning Yang & Filip Milisav & Jakub Kopal & Avram J. Holmes & Georgios D. Mitsis & Bratislav Misic & Emily S. Finn & Danilo Bzdok, 2023. "The default network dominates neural responses to evolving movie stories," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," Papers 1912.06346, arXiv.org.
    15. Hirofumi Takesue, 2020. "From defection to ingroup favoritism to cooperation: simulation analysis of the social dilemma in dynamic networks," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 189-207, April.
    16. Michael Kurtz & Steven Furnagiev & Rebecca Forbes, 2023. "A field study on the role of incidental emotions on charitable giving," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 167-181, January.
    17. Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Wang, Peng & Ma, Jun-Chao & Zhu, Peican & Han, Zhen & Podobnik, Boris & Stanley, H. Eugene & Zhou, Wei-Xing & Alfaro-Bittner, Karin & Boccaletti, Stefano, 2023. "Unraveling the effects of network, direct and indirect reciprocity in online societies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Dimitrios Tsiotas & Serafeim Polyzos, 2021. "Making the Web-Science Operational for Interregional Commuting Analysis: Evidence from Greece," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An Econometric Model of Network Formation With Degree Heterogeneity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1033-1063, July.
    20. Sun, Guang-Zhen, 2017. "The Samuelson condition and the Lindahl scheme in networks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 73-80.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-28432-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.