IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-22296-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the limitations in assessing stability of oxygen evolution catalysts using aqueous model electrochemical cells

Author

Listed:
  • Julius Knöppel

    (Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11)
    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Maximilian Möckl

    (ZAE Bayern, Electrochemical Energy Storage)

  • Daniel Escalera-López

    (Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11))

  • Kevin Stojanovski

    (Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11)
    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Markus Bierling

    (Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11)
    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Thomas Böhm

    (Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11)
    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Simon Thiele

    (Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11)
    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Matthias Rzepka

    (ZAE Bayern, Electrochemical Energy Storage)

  • Serhiy Cherevko

    (Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11))

Abstract

Recent research indicates a severe discrepancy between oxygen evolution reaction catalysts dissolution in aqueous model systems and membrane electrode assemblies. This questions the relevance of the widespread aqueous testing for real world application. In this study, we aim to determine the processes responsible for the dissolution discrepancy. Experimental parameters known to diverge in both systems are individually tested for their influence on dissolution of an Ir-based catalyst. Ir dissolution is studied in an aqueous model system, a scanning flow cell coupled to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. Real dissolution rates of the Ir OER catalyst in membrane electrode assemblies are measured with a specifically developed, dedicated setup. Overestimated acidity in the anode catalyst layer and stabilization over time in real devices are proposed as main contributors to the dissolution discrepancy. The results shown here lead to clear guidelines for anode electrocatalyst testing parameters to resemble realistic electrolyzer operating conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Julius Knöppel & Maximilian Möckl & Daniel Escalera-López & Kevin Stojanovski & Markus Bierling & Thomas Böhm & Simon Thiele & Matthias Rzepka & Serhiy Cherevko, 2021. "On the limitations in assessing stability of oxygen evolution catalysts using aqueous model electrochemical cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-22296-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22296-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22296-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-22296-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaoping Shi & Ji Li & Yibo Wang & Shiwei Liu & Jianbing Zhu & Jiahao Yang & Xian Wang & Jing Ni & Zheng Jiang & Lijuan Zhang & Ying Wang & Changpeng Liu & Wei Xing & Junjie Ge, 2023. "Customized reaction route for ruthenium oxide towards stabilized water oxidation in high-performance PEM electrolyzers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-22296-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.