IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v5y2015i12d10.1038_nclimate2826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Malte Meinshausen

    (Australian-German Climate & Energy College, The University of Melbourne
    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Telegraphenberg, 14412 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Louise Jeffery

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Telegraphenberg, 14412 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Johannes Guetschow

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Telegraphenberg, 14412 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Yann Robiou du Pont

    (Australian-German Climate & Energy College, The University of Melbourne)

  • Joeri Rogelj

    (Energy Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
    Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Universitaetsstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Michiel Schaeffer

    (Climate Analytics)

  • Niklas Höhne

    (New Climate Institute
    Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Michel den Elzen

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency)

  • Sebastian Oberthür

    (Institute for European Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Nicolai Meinshausen

    (Seminar für Statistik, ETH Zurich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Achieving the collective goal of limiting warming to below 2 °C or 1.5 °C compared to pre-industrial levels requires a transition towards a fully decarbonized world. Annual greenhouse gas emissions on such a path in 2025 or 2030 can be allocated to individual countries using a variety of allocation schemes. We reanalyse the IPCC literature allocation database and provide country-level details for three approaches. At this stage, however, it seems utopian to assume that the international community will agree on a single allocation scheme. Here, we investigate an approach that involves a major-economy country taking the lead. In a bottom-up manner, other countries then determine what they consider a fair comparable target, for example, either a ‘per-capita convergence’ or ‘equal cumulative per-capita’ approach. For example, we find that a 2030 target of 67% below 1990 for the EU28, a 2025 target of 54% below 2005 for the USA or a 2030 target of 32% below 2010 for China could secure a likely chance of meeting the 2 °C target in our illustrative default case. Comparing those targets to post-2020 mitigation targets reveals a large gap. No major emitter can at present claim to show the necessary leadership in the concerted effort of avoiding warming of 2 °C in a diverse global context.

Suggested Citation

  • Malte Meinshausen & Louise Jeffery & Johannes Guetschow & Yann Robiou du Pont & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Niklas Höhne & Michel den Elzen & Sebastian Oberthür & Nicolai Meinshausen, 2015. "National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1098-1106, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:5:y:2015:i:12:d:10.1038_nclimate2826
    DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2826
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nclimate2826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Shimei & Chen, Zhan-Ming, 2023. "Carbon inequality in China: Evidence from city-level data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Lining Wang & Han Chen & Wenying Chen, 2020. "Co-control of carbon dioxide and air pollutant emissions in China from a cost-effective perspective," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1177-1197, October.
    3. Humphrey, Jacquelyn E. & Li, Yong, 2021. "Who goes green: Reducing mutual fund emissions and its consequences," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Liu, Jing-Yu & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Masui, Toshihiko, 2016. "Temporal and spatial distribution of global mitigation costs: INDCs and generation equity," Conference papers 332680, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Mikkel Bennedsen, 2021. "Designing a statistical procedure for monitoring global carbon dioxide emissions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Piotr Bórawski & Michał Borychowski & Rafał Wyszomierski & Marek Bartłomiej Bórawski & Tomasz Rokicki & Luiza Ochnio & Krzysztof Jankowski & Bartosz Mickiewicz & James W. Dun, 2021. "Development of Solid Biomass Production in Poland, Especially Pellet, in the Context of the World’s and the European Union’s Climate and Energy Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    8. Man Li & Yanfang Zhang & Huancai Liu, 2022. "Carbon Neutrality in Shanxi Province: Scenario Simulation Based on LEAP and CA-Markov Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Piotr Żebrowski & Ulf Dieckmann & Åke Brännström & Oskar Franklin & Elena Rovenskaya, 2022. "Sharing the Burdens of Climate Mitigation and Adaptation: Incorporating Fairness Perspectives into Policy Optimization Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Ding, Qingguo & Wang, Jianxiao & Zhang, Bing & Yu, Yang, 2023. "Economic burden of China's fairness regulations on power generation sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    11. Jie Ma & Amos Oppong & Kingsley Nketia Acheampong & Lucille Aba Abruquah, 2018. "Forecasting Renewable Energy Consumption under Zero Assumptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Xunzhang Pan & Fei Teng, 2017. "Assessment of China’s Mitigation Targets in an Effort-Sharing Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    13. A. F. Hof & M. G. J. Elzen & A. Mendoza Beltran, 2016. "The EU 40 % greenhouse gas emission reduction target by 2030 in perspective," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 375-392, June.
    14. Oleg Smirnov, 2019. "Collective risk social dilemma and the consequences of the US withdrawal from international climate negotiations," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(4), pages 660-676, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:5:y:2015:i:12:d:10.1038_nclimate2826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.