IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v120y2023pe2219599120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating perceptions of the relative COVID risk of different social-distancing behaviors from respondents’ pairwise assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Ori Heffetz

    (c National Bureau of Economic Research , Cambridge , MA 02138)

  • Matthew Rabin

    (e Business School, Harvard University , Cambridge , MA 02138)

Abstract

How do people compare the effectiveness of different social-distancing behaviors in avoiding the spread of viral infection? During the COVID pandemic, we showed 676 online respondents in the United States, United Kingdom, and Israel 30 pairs of brief videos of acquaintances meeting. We asked respondents to indicate which video from each pair depicted greater risk of COVID infection. Their choices imply that on average, respondents considered talking 14 min longer to be as risky as standing 1 foot closer, being indoors as standing 3 feet closer, being exposed to coughs or sneezes as 3 to 4 ft closer, greeting with a hug as 7 ft closer, and with a handshake as 5 ft closer. Respondents considered properly masking as protecting the wearer and interlocutor equally, removing the mask entirely or only when talking as standing 4 to 5 ft closer but wearing it under the nose as only 1 to 2 ft closer. We provide weaker evidence on beliefs about the interaction effects of different behaviors. In a more limited, ex post analysis, we find little evidence of differences in beliefs across subpopulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ori Heffetz & Matthew Rabin, 2023. "Estimating perceptions of the relative COVID risk of different social-distancing behaviors from respondents’ pairwise assessments," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 120(7), pages 2219599120-, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:120:y:2023:p:e2219599120
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2219599120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219599120
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1073/pnas.2219599120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:120:y:2023:p:e2219599120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.