IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v117y2020p17516-17521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freedom of choice adds value to public goods

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Shi

    (Statistics and Mathematics College, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China; Interdisciplinary Research Institute of Data Science, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201209, China)

  • Ivan Romić

    (Statistics and Mathematics College, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China; Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China; Graduate School of Economics, Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585, Japan)

  • Yongjuan Ma

    (Statistics and Mathematics College, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China)

  • Zhen Wang

    (Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China; School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China)

  • Boris Podobnik

    (Center for Polymer Studies, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215; Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; Zagreb School of Economics and Management, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; Luxembourg School of Business, 2453 Luxembourg, Luxembourg; Faculty of Information Studies in Novo Mesto, SI-8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia)

  • H. Eugene Stanley

    (Center for Polymer Studies, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215; Tokyo Tech World Research Hub Initiative, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan)

  • Petter Holme

    (Tokyo Tech World Research Hub Initiative, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan)

  • Marko Jusup

    (Tokyo Tech World Research Hub Initiative, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan)

Abstract

Public goods, ranging from judiciary to sanitation to parkland, permeate daily life. They have been a subject of intense interdisciplinary study, with a traditional focus being on participation levels in isolated public goods games (PGGs) as opposed to a more recent focus on participation in PGGs embedded into complex social networks. We merged the two perspectives by arranging voluntary participants into one of three network configurations, upon which volunteers played a number of iterated PGGs within their network neighborhood. The purpose was to test whether the topology of social networks or a freedom to express preferences for some local public goods over others affect participation. The results show that changes in social networks are of little consequence, yet volunteers significantly increase participation when they freely express preferences. Surprisingly, the increase in participation happens from the very beginning of the game experiment, before any information about how others play can be gathered. Such information does get used later in the game as volunteers seek to correlate contributions with higher returns, thus adding significant value to public goods overall. These results are ascribable to a small number of behavioral phenotypes, and suggest that societies may be better off with bottom-up schemes for public goods provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Shi & Ivan Romić & Yongjuan Ma & Zhen Wang & Boris Podobnik & H. Eugene Stanley & Petter Holme & Marko Jusup, 2020. "Freedom of choice adds value to public goods," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(30), pages 17516-17521, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:17516-17521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/117/30/17516.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Bei & Yuan, Lin & Zou, Rongcheng & Su, Rui & Mi, Yuqiang, 2023. "The effect of migration on vaccination dilemma in networked populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Kulsum, Umma & Alam, Muntasir & Kamrujjaman, Md., 2024. "Modeling and investigating the dilemma of early and delayed vaccination driven by the dynamics of imitation and aspiration," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Han, Jia-Xu & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2023. "Complex interactions promote the frequency of cooperation in snowdrift game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    4. Hou, Yunxiang & Lu, Yikang & Dong, Yuting & Jin, Libin & Shi, Lei, 2023. "Impact of different social attitudes on epidemic spreading in activity-driven networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    5. Guan, Kaixuan & Chen, Yuyou & Zheng, Wanjun & Zeng, Lulu & Ye, Hang, 2022. "Costly signals can facilitate cooperation and punishment in the prisoner’s dilemma," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    6. Liu, Yandi & Wang, Hexin & Ding, Yi & Yang, Xuan & Dai, Yu, 2022. "Can weak diversity help in propagating cooperation? Invasion of cooperators at the conformity-conflict boundary," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Zhang, Lan & Pan, Jianchen & Huang, Changwei, 2023. "Effect of mixed random and directional migration on cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Chica, Manuel & Hernández, Juan M. & Santos, Francisco C., 2022. "Cooperation dynamics under pandemic risks and heterogeneous economic interdependence," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. Ma, Yin-Jie & Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Podobnik, Boris, 2022. "Predictability of players’ actions as a mechanism to boost cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:17516-17521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.